My problem here is making a Johnsonian distinction between fleas
and lice. That is to say I have very little time for abstract defence of
the role of the traditional intellectual which is the core of the opposition to
impact assessment. On the other hand I have equally no time for a
research agenda dictated by the needs of ‘UK PLC’. However, a
contest about what is relevant research is actually an important part of organic
intellectual activity – in other words if people involved with Capital
and Class think their research has no impact then they should be doing
something else. It is a matter of what impact and for whom and that is something
where we fight instead of pretending to be little intellectual tin gods way
above the sordid issues of what knowledge actually does in the world.
David Byrne
From: To complement the journal 'Capital and
Class' (ISSN 0 309 8786) [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Wells, Julian
Sent: 26 October 2009 13:26
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Stand up for research - appeal from UCU
This is likely to be already on the agenda of many
CAPITAL-AND-CLASS list members – so this is a note to suggest that you
move it to the top of your personal agenda right now: it only takes a few
seconds to sign up, and the HEFCE proposals have ominous implications for the
kind of research programmes of relevance to the journal.
Dr Julian Wells
staff web-page: http://fass.kingston.ac.uk/staff/cv.php?staffnum=287
personal web-site: http://staffnet.kingston.ac.uk/~ku32530
Senior lecturer in economics
School of Economics
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
Kingston University
Penrhyn Road
Kingston-upon-Thames
KT1 2EE
United Kingdom
+44 (0)20 8417 2124
From: Association for Heterodox Economics
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Denis, Andy
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 10:56 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [HETECON] Stand up for research - appeal from UCU
Dear colleague
STAND UP FOR RESEARCH
Please join the six UK Nobel Laureates and many other leading academics who have
already signed UCU's statement opposing proposals from HEFCE to change funding
criteria.
To sign click: http://www.ucu.org.uk/standupforresearch
If implemented, the proposals would mean that 25% of future research funding
would be allocated according to its ‘economic and social impact’.
HEFCE has put these proposals out to consultation and the deadline for
submissions is 16 December.
The UCU believes that these ‘impact’ proposals represent an attack
on the knowledge process and constitute a threat to the existence of basic
research activity in the UK.
Our statement calls on HEFCE to withdraw these proposals. We intend to submit
this statement to the funding council and to publish the list of names.
It is already abundantly clear that these proposals do not have the support of
the academic community.
We need every member to sign this statement and to then pass on the link to
colleagues to ensure that the voice of the profession is heard.
Please add your name to the list here and circulate this link among your
colleagues: http://www.ucu.org.uk/standupforresearch
Thank you for taking the time to read this letter. Please contact me if you
want to discuss it further.
Best wishes
Sally Hunt
UCU general secretary
===
Support your colleagues, support your union:
http://www.ucu.org.uk/campaigns
Join us online:
http://twitter.com/ucu | http://facebook.com/ucu.campaigns
Keep up-to-date: subscribe to UCU's weekly website email or find our news feeds
at:
http://www.ucu.org.uk/stayupdated
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.