Print

Print


There has been a new development in the Johnson/Goldsmith debate. 
Charles Bernstein notified me to say that he had reproduced, in 2006, 
Kenny’s ‘Weather’ in full:

http://epc.buffalo.edu/authors/bernstein/blog/archive/weather.html

The inference being that Kent's doing the same with Day is passe. In 
response to this new development Kent says:

‘Fascinating!
 
There is an important difference, though. Bernstein announces that the 
work is by Goldsmith, and he seems to add his name in a playful sort of 
gesture, a kind of "afterthought" beneath "Kenny Goldsmith's The 
Weather." It's a "half-hearted" ironic tweak, so to speak.
 
I'm not doing that. I'm *erasing* Goldsmith's name and affirming 
myself as the book's Author! I'm affirming (sardonic though the 
affirmation is) the book as my "property." Which is to say that the 
category of Authorship is bracketed in uncomfortable sorts of ways.
 
Feel free to send this on to Charles.’

Which I did. I won’t quote Charles’s full response as I haven’t got his 
permission to do so. But he said that he used his version of ‘Weather’ 
in teaching a course on Goldsmith. And said the piece ‘seemed more 
fresh three or four year ago’

Kenny’s response to this is:

‘I think you need to spread this all over the place, Jeffrey. It takes the 
whole discussion into a new area. Please quote my letter if you do so 
at Poetics and your blog. There is simply no comparison. 
 
Charles *always* needs to be first! (note the hilarious remark about 
how it seemed "more fresh three or four years ago"!)’

Which is why I’m posting it here.