Print

Print


We have regularly taught Visual Poetry as part of our MA programme, and 
I have supervised a couple of MA theses on Cobbing.


Robert


mIEKAL aND wrote:


>Ian—Yr to be lauded for taking a stab at writing about visual poetry,  
>I would love to read it sometime (or better yet make it accessible to  
>the SPIDERTANGLE mailing list, which has several hundred vispoets  
>listening in).
>
>  As far as I know there are no academic magazines devoted to vispo  
>(tho Visible Language did a number of special issues) or for that  
>matter there are only a couple folks I know that teach an occasional  
>class in vispo.  Compare that to the reception that language & post  
>language writing has in US universities.  Part of the issue as I see  
>it is the the literary folks don't think it's poetry & the art folks  
>don't think it's art.  As far as I can tell visual poetry's best  
>reception has been in the new media departments where it's seen as an  
>antecedent to interactive media arts.
>
>I mean after all, how many universities in the UK are teaching Cobbing?
>
>
>~mIEKAL
>
>
>On Oct 23, 2009, at 12:17 PM, ian davidson wrote:
>
>> "I completely take your point about visual poetry tho: a criminally  
>> marginalised area. absolutely.
>> Sean"
>>
>> Sean and Miekal
>>
>> Without a glimmer of self promotion there's a whole chapter on  
>> visual poetry in my recent book Ideas of Space in Contemporary  
>> Poetry. And there have been a couple of pretty high profile  
>> exhibitions in london, and one in glasgow I think?
>>
>> There are some more specialist books about by Joanna Drucker which  
>> are pretty good.
>>
>> But I do agree, it does get marginalised, and endless primary school  
>> teachers getting children to write poems in the shape of a christmas  
>> tree doesn't help. it's nearly that time of year again.
>>
>> Do you want to say anything about your visual practice Sean? Or the  
>> visual nature of your poems?
>>
>> Ian
>>
>> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:53:57 +0000
>> From: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Journal of British and Irish Innovative Poetry launch  
>> at Birkbeck (Weds 21st October 2009)
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>
>> Hi mIEKAL // what I was trying get at was what I understood to be  
>> Jeff's claim that academic commentary on poetry would necessarily  
>> limit it. When I said it 'reflects the liveliness of the scene' I  
>> meant that academic interest comes about because there's a range of  
>> practices (outside the university) that academics are interested to  
>> write about, and so rather than academic writing being prescriptive,  
>> its hopefully a commentary on whats already happening.
>> I completely take your point about visual poetry tho: a criminally  
>> marginalised area. absolutely.
>> Sean
>>
>> http://abandonedbuildings.blogspot.com/
>>
>> --- On Fri, 23/10/09, mIEKAL aND <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> From: mIEKAL aND <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Re: Journal of British and Irish Innovative Poetry launch  
>> at Birkbeck (Weds 21st October 2009)
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Date: Friday, 23 October, 2009, 2:14 PM
>>
>> Sean, normally I find myself agreeing with your comments but this  
>> one has me scratching my head.  I'll give you an example that has  
>> perplexed my community of practitioners seemingly forever.  Visual  
>> Poetry has an extremely vibrant & endless interesting field of  
>> production, with work by hundreds of artist going back 50 years, yet  
>> there has been an almost complete hands off from academia, except  
>> for the occasional one off.  Perhaps yr speaking to the specific  
>> scene yr a part of & I'm missing the point.
>>
>> ~mIEKAL
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Sean Bonney <[log in to unmask]>  
>> wrote:
>> Poetry is not getting 'hedged in' by academia. Academic interest  
>> reflects the liveliness of the scene in general.
>
>
>
>
>