Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=10053, phase=RECEIVE, target=10.0.0.37:2306). The server is probably not started. JISCMail - SPM Archives

Print

Print


It's not huge, but it's more than I think it should be.

From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 12:49 PM
To: Fromm, Stephen (NIH/NIMH) [C]
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: RE: question of the results

Hi Stephen:

the attached is the results from the two versions of matlab. Do you think the differece is huge?

Could you let me know?

THank you.

bing

Original Message -----
From: "Fromm, Stephen (NIH/NIMH) [C]" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Friday, September 4, 2009 1:42 pm
Subject: RE: question of the results
To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>

> How little is "little"?
>
> Stephen J. Fromm, PhD
> Contractor, NIMH/MAP
> (301) 451--9265
> ________________________________
> From: [log in to unmask] [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 1:38 PM
> To: Fromm, Stephen (NIH/NIMH) [C]
> Subject: Re: question of the results
>
> Thank you Stephen. THe difference is little not substantial. DO
> you think it is possible?
>
> thanks again.
>
> bing
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stephen J. Fromm" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Friday, September 4, 2009 11:12 am
> Subject: Re: question of the results
> To: [log in to unmask], Bing Ye <[log in to unmask]>
> Cc: "Stephen J. Fromm" <[log in to unmask]>
>
> > On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:38:39 -0400, Bing Ye
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > >Hi all:
> > >
> > >for spm 5 result part, would i get exactly the same result if i
> > use two
> > different versions of matlabs?
> > >
> > >I run spm5 from 7.1 version first and then run spm5 from 6.5
> > version. but for
> > the same subject, i got similar results not exactly the same, i
> > wonder if the
> > reason is the two different versions of the matlab.
> >
> > I'd be very surprised if there was any substantial difference,
> > UNLESS there's
> > some reason that SPM5 doesn't work properly with matlab
> > 6.5.  (But in that
> > case, there should be an error and it shoudl stop running.)
> >
> > The _most_ I would expect would be a difference on the order of
> > machine
> > precision.  Anything larger, something funny is going on,
> > or maybe you made a
> > trivial mistake entering something.
> >
> > >
> > >Can anybody explain?
> > >
> > >thanks a bunch.
> > >
> > >bing
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>