 |
 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, David Berry wrote: > 2009/8/26 Peter W. Draper <[log in to unmask]>: >> On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, David Nutter wrote: >> >>> I don't know if this is a bug or user error (I know what it usually >>> is!), but if I generate a gaussclumps catalogue in cupid, and add the >>> extra columns with GAUSSCLUMPS.extracols=1, then Gaia won't plot the >>> catalogue. Instead, it gives the error "Unknown STC shape". I added >>> the extra columns to get FWHMs of the fitted gaussians in Gaussclumps. >>> Is there an alternative way to get these, without breaking (?) the >>> plotting in gaia? >> >> Hi Dave, >> >> you can open a catalogue like this and get something plotted if you untick >> the "STC shape" option when importing the CUPID catalogue -- this will draw >> a simple rectangle. > > Hi Peter, > So is this an AST problem? I was just looking at > :draw_stcshape in StarRtdImage.C and was beginning to think it may be. Don't know yet. Just offering a work around while I look at it in more depth. If it is an AST issue I'll let you know. >> Peter. >> >>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:53 PM, David Berry<[log in to unmask]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> There's an undocumented debugging feature that gives access to a few. >>>> If the configuration parameter "GaussClumps.ExtraCols" is set to a >>>> positive integer, then extra method-specific columns are added to the >>>> output catalogue. If ExtraCols is set to 1, then the catalogue will >>>> include columns with names GCFWHM<i> (where <i> is 1, 2, or 3), >>>> holding the FWHM of the fitted Gaussian in units of pixels (these FWHM >>>> values have NOT been reduced to excluded the effect of the beam >>>> width). >>>> >>>> Setting ExtraCols to 2 gives more columns including GCCHISQ that holds >>>> the chi-squared. >>>> >>>> David >>>> >>>> 2009/7/21 Jason Kirk <[log in to unmask]>: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> A quick question about the FITS catalogues produced by CUPID. For the >>>>> gaussclumps method there are parameters from the fit of the gaussian to >>>>> the >>>>> data that aren't propagated to the normal output catalogue (position >>>>> angle, >>>>> chi-squared value, FWHMs etc). Is there an easy way of getting at the >>>>> values >>>>> for these parameters. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> -Jason >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Peter W. Draper, http://astro.dur.ac.uk/~pdraper >> > -- Peter W. Draper, http://astro.dur.ac.uk/~pdraper