 |
 |
Hi Stephen, Steve... Unfortunately, I need something up and running. I can have a look to the new yaim but I doubt that there is proper documentation already available to know which exact variables and formats do I have to implement... But anyway, please provide me the proper yaim version, and links... Regarding the SGE support, it is now mainly handled by CESGA with some help from us @ LIP. But all the possible efforts are now put on CREAMCE support... but we really need some more people on this task. Cheer Goncalo On 08/06/2009 11:14 AM, Steve Traylen wrote: > 2009/8/6 Gonçalo Borges<[log in to unmask]>: > >> Hi Stephen and Steve... >> >> The CEs (i.e. the glue CEs, corresponding to the queues) have to point to >> different clusters and subclusters. See: >> >> http://goc.grid.sinica.edu.tw/gocwiki/How_to_publish_different_memory_limits_for_different_queues_on_the_same_CE >> >> http://goc.grid.sinica.edu.tw/gocwiki/How_to_publish_the_OS_name >> >> http://goc.grid.sinica.edu.tw/gocwiki/How_to_publish_my_machine_architecture >> >> >> >> Does yaim supports these GlueClusters? If not, this implementations are >> simply not feasible for us... At the rithm we have middleware updates (once >> a week), most of them with yaim reconfiguration, you would break everything >> you did by hand. I would not mind to set up such a mechanism if there is the >> guaranty that it is not destroyed by a yaim reconfiguration, otherwise it is >> just simpler to start a new CE, as Steve pointed out. >> >> > As I mentioned no. > https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/EGEE/WNWorkingGroup > has some cutting edge stuff to do it but it needs some testing... As > in don't use > it unless you want to test and provide feed back. > Steve > > >> The information system is presenting a >> "GlueCEStateFreeJobSlots" value >> (in the "dn: GlueVOViewLocalID" fields) representing the sum of >> resources for both queues, >> >> >> >> >> That sounds like you don't have the info provider configured correctly, but >> I have no idea how the sge provider works - do you know who supports it? >> >> >> This is presently a problem. It was supported by LeSC, but unfortunately the >> guy went away and no one is taking this job (it is just on a best effor >> basis). Indeed, the two clusters are not sharing WNs, and therefore, they >> should present proper values. I'll try to look to the script myself... >> >> Cheers >> Goncalo >> >> >> > > > >