Print

Print


Hi,

Thanks a lot. I start it straight away and let you know whether it 
solved myt troubles.

wolf
Matthew Webster wrote:
> Hi,
>      I've put a new version of flameo into:
>
> http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsldownloads/patches/flameo_c5_64
>
> to install copy over 
>
> $FSLDIR/bin/flameo
>
> Many Regards
>
> Matthew
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for this offer. This might be helpfull since I did not manage 
>> to run the whole analysis yet und try to track down the Problem. I 
>> run FSL on machines with CentOS 5.3 64bit.
>>
>> wolf
>>
>>
>> Matthew Webster wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>           This error message may be due to a different flameo bug 
>>> that we have recently fixed in our internal builds. If you let me 
>>> know which architecture you are using I can send you a test-version 
>>> of the current internal flameo?
>>>
>>> Many Regards
>>>
>>> Matthew
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I had a problem with  a higher level analysis:
>>>>
>>>>     An exception has been thrown
>>>>     Runtime error:- detected by Newmat: matrix is singular
>>>>
>>>> Searching the mailing list gave me a possible solution, that this 
>>>> could happen, if the mask includes voxels in the filtered_func_data 
>>>> 4D file with all zeros. In a post 
>>>> <https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0809&L=FSL&D=0&P=179482> 
>>>> about a year ago it was stated that this problem is solved with a 
>>>> new FSL version. However, recently 
>>>> <https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0906&L=FSL&D=0&P=94017> 
>>>> there was a comparable discussion with the result that the mask 
>>>> should not include voxels with all zero. So, is it still a problem 
>>>> when the mask includes zero-voxels? If so, what is the best trick 
>>>> to avoid the creation of a mask as preparatory step in the higher 
>>>> level analysis and instead use an alternative a mask similar as one 
>>>> can do in the first level analysis at the end of the .fsf-file? So 
>>>> far I copied a custom made mask into the gfeat-directory at the 
>>>> beginning of the analysis and made sure that it is write protected. 
>>>> Did work fine until today...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the help,
>>>> wolf
>>>>
>>>
>>
>