But having just checked the spreadsheet I use
to store the all my CLEA 1.04 input parameters there is no extra space.
It also occurs that, on the second check
yesterday, I entered the data directly in to a new blank veriosn of CLEA
and still got the same error. Think I'll be downloading a fresh copy from the EA
website.
Now very confused...
Anyone else has this problem? I guess it just undelines
the need to check everything... about 7 times.
Thanks for the replies - all much appreciated.
A couple of people sent through spreadsheets of their
own CLEA input for Cr(III). On initial inspection the parameters and other
settings were identical to mine, however, running the model my dataset gave 3400
mg/kg whilst the other two gave 3000 mg/kg. The difference was due to a higher
inhalation pathway AC.
Closer inspection revealed that in my dataset the entry
in the 'Inhal HCV - Type' column wasn't aligned with the other lines in the
column. An extra space had crept into the entry on my spreadsheet: "_TDI" as
opposed to "TDI". A quick deletion and all was well.
I love this job!
Duncan
DUNCAN
FAIRWOOD
Principal
Consultant
BAE
Systems Environmental
Euxton
Lane,
Chorley, Lancashire,
PR7 6AQ
Tel: +44(0)1257
242008
Fax: +44(0)1257
242018
Mobile: +44(0)7793 421835
Environmental
Consultancy / Remediation Consultancy & Contracting
Visit
our website at - www.baesystems.com/environmental
Please consider the
environment before printing this e-mail
BAE Systems Properties Limited
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO
Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU,
UK
Registered in England & Wales No:
2863702
I'm working through
the LQM book replicating the GAC in CLEA and comparing to our in-house numbers.
I am struggling to reproduce the GACs for chromium (III) exactly; I am
getting close but not close enough - 3400 mg/kg (2sf) for Residential as opposed
to the quoted 3000 mg/kg.
Running other 'LQM'
metals at the same time returns the published numbers; so its something
specific to chromium. I have entered the quoted parameters from the LQM book
into a fresh CLEA sheet and double checked but get the same
result.
I assume both
LQM and other folks have reproduced the 3000 mg/kg GAC and that its
something I'm mis-reading or have done wrong? Are there anything specific peculiarities in
generating the Cr GAC? Any pointers
gratefully received (other than coming back to it afresh in the
morning!).
Thanks,
Duncan
DUNCAN
FAIRWOOD
Principal
Consultant
BAE
Systems Environmental
Euxton
Lane,
Chorley, Lancashire,
PR7 6AQ
Tel: +44(0)1257
242008
Fax: +44(0)1257
242018
Mobile: +44(0)7793 421835
Environmental
Consultancy / Remediation Consultancy & Contracting
Visit
our website at - www.baesystems.com/environmental
Please consider the
environment before printing this e-mail
BAE Systems Properties Limited
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO
Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU,
UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 2863702