Print

Print


Dear SPM,
 
Now, I exited SPM and loaded again, and then loaded data, deleted previous inversion and performed new inversion, now it looked a bit more sensitive, but I am not sure about matlab noted that have been produced, where it says 'try-catch' syntax that will not work above R2007b, and mine is R2008b (Matlab v 7.7.0):
 
SPM8: GUI cleared                                  17:13:41 - 31/07/2009
========================================================================
projecting electrodes on skin surface
combining electrode transfer and system matrix
Localising source nr 1.
Warning: Setting the "KeyPressFcn" property is not permitted while this mode is
active.
> In uitools.uimodemanager.uimodemanager>localModeWarn at 59
  In spm_figure at 318
  In spm_clf at 29
  In spm_eeg_inv_vbecd at 126
  In spm_eeg_inv_vbecd_gui at 398
  In spm_eeg_invert_ui at 51
  In spm_eeg_inv_imag_api>Inverse_Callback at 94
  In spm_eeg_inv_imag_api at 53
Warning: Setting the "WindowButtonDownFcn" property is not permitted while this mode
is active.
> In uitools.uimodemanager.uimodemanager>localModeWarn at 59
  In spm_figure at 318
  In spm_clf at 29
  In spm_eeg_inv_vbecd at 126
  In spm_eeg_inv_vbecd_gui at 398
  In spm_eeg_invert_ui at 51
  In spm_eeg_inv_imag_api>Inverse_Callback at 94
  In spm_eeg_inv_imag_api at 53
Warning: Setting the "WindowButtonUpFcn" property is not permitted while this mode is
active.
> In uitools.uimodemanager.uimodemanager>localModeWarn at 59
  In spm_figure at 318
  In spm_clf at 29
  In spm_eeg_inv_vbecd at 126
  In spm_eeg_inv_vbecd_gui at 398
  In spm_eeg_invert_ui at 51
  In spm_eeg_inv_imag_api>Inverse_Callback at 94
  In spm_eeg_inv_imag_api at 53
Warning: File: spm_eeg_displayECD.m Line: 30 Column: 5
This try-catch syntax will continue to work in R2007b,
 but may be illegal or may mean something different in future releases of MATLAB.
 See Release Notes for MATLAB Version 7.4, "Warning Generated by try-catch" for details.
> In spm_eeg_inv_vbecd>displayVBupdate at 353
  In spm_eeg_inv_vbecd at 131
  In spm_eeg_inv_vbecd_gui at 398
  In spm_eeg_invert_ui at 51
  In spm_eeg_inv_imag_api>Inverse_Callback at 94
  In spm_eeg_inv_imag_api at 53
  1/200, F: -1750.051151  dFr: 39344095001411109000.000000
  2/200, F: -1167.907459  dFr: 582.143692
  3/200, F: -1135.273510  dFr: 32.633949
  4/200, F: -1108.301430  dFr: 26.972080
  5/200, F: -1103.182428  dFr: 5.119001
  6/200, F: -1102.044714  dFr: 1.137714
  7/200, F: -1102.328574  dFr: -0.283860
  8/200, F: -1102.901585  dFr: -0.573011
  9/200, F: -1103.285809  dFr: -0.384224
 10/200, F: -1103.652930  dFr: -0.367122
 11/200, F: -1103.946582  dFr: -0.293651
 12/200, F: -1104.190417  dFr: -0.243835
 13/200, F: -1104.403557  dFr: -0.213140
 14/200, F: -1104.597733  dFr: -0.194176
 15/200, F: -1104.779493  dFr: -0.181760
 16/200, F: -1104.951998  dFr: -0.172506
 17/200, F: -1105.116407  dFr: -0.164409
 18/200, F: -1105.272848  dFr: -0.156441
 19/200, F: -1105.421036  dFr: -0.148188
 20/200, F: -1105.560618  dFr: -0.139582
 21/200, F: -1105.691329  dFr: -0.130711
 22/200, F: -1105.813048  dFr: -0.121718
 23/200, F: -1105.925795  dFr: -0.112747
 24/200, F: -1106.029712  dFr: -0.103918
 25/200, F: -1106.125037  dFr: -0.095324
 26/200, F: -1106.212072  dFr: -0.087035
 27/200, F: -1106.291172  dFr: -0.079100
 28/200, F: -1106.362733  dFr: -0.071561
 29/200, F: -1106.427208  dFr: -0.064475
 30/200, F: -1106.485168  dFr: -0.057959
 31/200, F: -1106.537494  dFr: -0.052327
 32/200, F: -1106.585938  dFr: -0.048444
 33/200, F: -1106.634676  dFr: -0.048738
 34/200, F: -1106.595303  dFr: 0.039373
 35/200, F: -1106.682196  dFr: -0.086893
 36/200, F: -1106.640585  dFr: 0.041611
 37/200, F: -1106.632628  dFr: 0.007957
ans =
     1
Change dipole
>>
 
Thank you for your help!

Regards,
Antanas
 
 
 
Dear SPM,
 
To continue with the inversion problem which I have pointed in the first letter, now, when I put the same combination of dipoles it gives me completely different and much worse result! I have deleted all inversions and started a new, and still different inversion for the same combination!
 
Regards,
Antanas
Dear SPM,
 
I am trying to reconstruct sources for one EEG time series. When I did first inversion with 3 pairs and 1 single dipole, all looked good, then i attempted to invert another combination of dipoles, and after inversion all sources (I've put 2) centered on one spot with poor fit, the third inversion with different number of dipoles (4 total) showed exactly the same as for previous and when I try to access other previous inversions in the same source reconstruction GUI window for the same data set, it shows only results of the second. What am I doing wrong? Thank you very much!!!
 
Regards,
Antanas