Thanks to everyone who replied to my
query.
I received the following
responses……
1) We do the same as you but no evidence.
2) For amino acids we use 1.0 mmol/L.
No evidence for validity of this value.
3) We use 1 mmol/L but again no evidence just a nice round
number that few samples fall below.
4) We also choose <2.0. ?
sensitivity of the Beckman urine creatinine method.
One well know NEQAS organiser (yes, the Scottish
one) sent me some data to show that between lab agreement for creatinine
is quite good down to 1mmol/L. However as the
average man excretes about 10mmol creatinine per day this would equate to a
urine output would of10L. So the question
is perhaps not what is analytically valid but is the sample representative? It seems
reasonable to suggest repeating the test
on an EMU sample if the creatinine is less than about 2mmol/L.
From:
Sent: 27 July 2009 15:38
To:
Subject: Ratios with creatinine:
when is urine too dilute?
Hello everyone,
A question related to samples for ACR, PCR or
anything else reported as a ratio with
creatinine…………...
When is a sample too dilute to produce a valid
result?
We have traditionally flagged samples from adults
with creatinine <2.0mmol/L as dilute and suggested
repeating on an EMU, but I’ve no evidence that
2.0mmol/L is a valid cut off.
What do the rest of you do with dilute samples and do
you have you any evidence for your approach?
(If I receive replies directly I’ll anonymise
them and post a summary later in the week).
Thanks,
Mr WH Bradbury
Consultant Biochemist
Biochemistry Department
CA2 7HY
Tel: 01228
814521
Fax: 01228
814831
E-mail: [log in to unmask]