 |
 |
>> >> PS We seem to have overtaken Glasgow :-). > > Aggghh, damn you! Of course, we ran out of jobs so we need more work... > > What's more interesting, of course, is the analysis throughput we each > get. I want to know if you get substantially better throughput than us > with your whizzy lustre vs. our humble rfcp to local disk. > According to our accounting the jobs that ran yesterday had an cpu/wall time efficiency of ~64% . Assuming I'm reading out the switch correctly the traffic from the storage was peaking at ~700 MB/s with ~500 jobs running. We believe we can achieve ~5 times that, so it will be interested in seeing what happens when the cluster is fully loaded. cheers, Alex