Print

Print


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Helmut Laufs" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "Michael Froelich" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: 2nd-level Smoothing


> Yes, you would. In addtion you may want to use imcalc to apply a mask 
> afterwards in order to limit "blobs" to the brain.
>
> Bw,
>
> Helmut
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Michael Froelich" <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:32 PM
> Subject: 2nd-level Smoothing
>
>
> Dear SPM community,
>
> At the SPM8 refresher course, the question about smoothing was asked. IN 
> reply, Dr.
> Friston recommended an approximate 6 mm smoothing kernel both for the 
> first and second
> level. How is the smoothing accomplished at the second level?
>
> Would we smooth the ".con" images prior to entering them into a 2nd level 
> analysis?
>
> Michael Froelich
>
> University of Alabama at Birmingham
> Anesthesiology
>