Hi Sarah and all

 

Well mentoring (and coaching) I believe is seen differently in different educational sectors. In schools, and if we take Teacher Training as an example, it has a high profile where as in FE colleges it has less prominence with many staff perceiving the role as being yet another burden to their already heavy workloads. Recently however, I was involved in delivering staff development at one of the local colleges; high-lighting the benefits of mentoring to an organisation. The cost benefit analysis is appealing especially in these financially turbulent times. Many managers can see mentoring being used as an effective staff development tool at all levels of the organisation – from management downwards. If we exploit these virtues then I believe that mentoring will be seen as a productive and effective organisational tool which will enhance the CPD of all teaching staff, not just for trainee teachers but new staff and staff with new and expanding roles etc. Perhaps this is a way forward? Best wishes. Jan

 

Dr. Jan Oti (PhD)

Senior Lecturer, School of Education/Ysgol Addysg
Caerleon Campus/Campws Caerllion

Lodge Road/ Heol y Porthdy

Caerleon/Caerllion

Newport/Casnewydd

NP18 3QT

tel 01633 432122/rhif ffôn

http://education.newport.ac.uk/


From: BERA-MENTORING-COACHING [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sarah Fletcher
Sent: 10 June 2009 11:36
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: How mentoring and coaching might improve teachers' CPD in Japanese schools

 

Thanks, Jan - could you elaborate a little please? (Sorry - I know you are busy..) but I would certainly like to know more about mentoring as an organisational tool in schools

Warm regards,

Sarah

Sarah Fletcher

Consultant Research Mentor

http://www.TeacherResearch.net
Convenor for BERA Mentoring and Coaching SIG
Details at http://www.bera.ac.uk

--- On Wed, 6/10/09, Janet Oti <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


From: Janet Oti <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: How mentoring and coaching might improve teachers' CPD in Japanese schools
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 10:55 AM

Hi All. This is an interesting discussion and my apologies for not joining in earlier - but pressures of work at this time of year etc - as we're all under!
Just thought I could add another dimension to the debate - what of mentoring seen as an organisational tool. Perhaps this could be a way forward so that we can encourage more mentoring activities at all levels within an educational establishment and demonstrate its importance for CPD. (Hope this aspect has not been discussed earlier?)

Dr. Jan Oti (PhD)
Senior Lecturer, School of Education/Ysgol Addysg
Caerleon Campus/Campws Caerllion
Lodge Road/ Heol y Porthdy
Caerleon/Caerllion
Newport/Casnewydd
NP18 3QT
tel 01633 432122/rhif ffôn

http://education.newport.ac.uk/

-----Original Message-----
From: BERA-MENTORING-COACHING [mailto:[log in to unmask]" ymailto="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Peter Stopp
Sent: 10 June 2009 09:51
To: [log in to unmask]" ymailto="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: How mentoring and coaching might improve teachers' CPD in Japanese schools

Thank you, Dianne, for moving the discussion on from debating the meaning of terms, to more of an analysis of processes as that is more informative and useful.
The four step problem-solving approach provides a flexible way of approaching a mentoring conversation. It sounds rather top-down - like the 'adult' part of Berne's model, perhaps? It can, of course be used jointly in a peer-mentoring context - which seems like the 'child' element of Berne's approach, possibly? They need, as the  Berne model implies, balancing by caring/supporting relationship. Sometimes, in my experience, mentors can be stuck in one of those moulds - and it is perhaps in those respects that there is a need for flexibility. I found in my research in teacher education that the approach needed to change as a teaching placement progressed, along the lines of the Furlong and Maynard stages, yet mentors often did not change. Does that match others' experience?
My research can be viewed at http://www.cfkeep.org/users/peterstopp/mentoring%20conversations  if you are interested in that.
I seem unable to download Tadashi's attachments, sorry, so I cannot respond to them at all..
Peter

________________________________

From: BERA-MENTORING-COACHING on behalf of Dianne Allen
Sent: Tue 09/06/2009 22:23
To: [log in to unmask]" ymailto="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: How mentoring and coaching might improve teachers' CPD in Japanese schools


Sarah, and others, my inclination about models for mentoring, for coaching, for teaching, for managing, for any situation in which a professional(person) is involved with dealing with people is 'be as open as possible to multiple models', and for dealing with crunch points that don't respond to your most regualr model ...

And the model for this flexibility in model use to deal with problems? (if this is not tautology or an oxymoron/ contradiction in terms) ... is something like the four (or more step) process of problem solving: ie beware the symptom-treatment trap; and work on the many options between symptom and diagnosis; test diagnosis if at all possible, and work ont he many options between diagnosis and choice of treatment, and by careful observation/ questioning for data collection to inform the analysis that leads to a diagnosis, and by careful review of options of treatment so the one chosen is most relevant to this case, as a special case.

eg see http://www.gdrc.org/decision/problem-solve.html for six steps, and http://managementhelp.org/prsn_prd/prb_bsc.htm ; http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newCT_10.htm; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Problem_Solving_Process for others) and yes they look like action research, and Kounai-ken has some of these phases so far as I can see ...

Dianne Allen
Kiama


    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Sarah Fletcher <mailto:[log in to unmask]" ymailto="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
    To: [log in to unmask]" ymailto="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
    Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:30 AM
    Subject: Re: How mentoring and coaching might improve teachers' CPD in Japanese schools

Dear Tadashi, (Dear All)

Thank you so much for responding to my question in such a thought-provoking way.  I realised that business coaches see mentoring as a sub-set of mentoring when I ran a programme for the LifeLong Learning Division at the University of Bath in Swindon. I have also noticed this when I examine the MA dissertations from the Business School at Oxford Brookes University.  Perhaps this is because (until relatively recently) business was more geared to outcomes and skills than the majority of schools perceived themselves as being. Now we have league tables. which haven't always existed (!), schools have become more outcome focused and as a result have adopted skills coaching and relegated mentoring to supporting students who have learning difficulties and initial teacher training and induction.

When I trained to become a school-based mentor under the Licensed Teacher Scheme in Bedfordshire, my mentor was Mike Berrill - he wrote a brilliant article entitled ITE at the Crossroads, which was published in the Cambridge Journal of Education (I'll find you the reference and circulate it). Mike used Eric Berne's concept of transactional analysis to help us understand (as novice mentors) that we need to operate in all 3 dimensions to engage effectively with mentees; as adult, as parent and as child.  There is no one superior state - we need to be able to develop ways to relate across all three as the parent takes care of others, the adult stands back and can analyse the big picture and the child needs to play. (I'd be lost without the child bit as I experiment with using the KEEP toolkit templates for teacher researchers...) Well rounded professionals can operate in each of Berne's modes.

Now I see Transactional Analysis is one of the major models in the practice of coaching... I thoroughly recommend this site: http://www.businessballs.com/transactionalanalysis.htm
the group at Swindon told me about it. (There are links to all sorts of coaching resources).

I wonder if it might be a useful model to consider for supporting teachers in kounai ken or if it works better in some cultures than others? (I will be interested to hear others views too)

Warmest regards,

Sarah

Sarah Fletcher

Consultant Research Mentor

http://www.TeacherResearch.net
Convenor for BERA Mentoring and Coaching SIG
Details at http://www.bera.ac.uk

--- On Mon, 6/8/09, Tadashi?ASADA <[log in to unmask]" ymailto="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]> wrote:



    From: Tadashi?ASADA <[log in to unmask]" ymailto="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]>
    Subject: Re: How mentoring and coaching might improve teachers' CPD in Japanese schools
    To: [log in to unmask]" ymailto="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
    Date: Monday, June 8, 2009, 2:04 PM
   
   
    Dear Sarah,
   
    >I'd like to know more about how you see mentoring and coaching
    >complementing one another as a means to facilitating teachers' learning. Do
    >you think the skills involved in mentoring and coaching are the same or
    >distinct?
   
    Thank you so much. Your question is difficult.
    I think the notion of mentaring involes/contains that of coaching.
    Generally, coaching focuses on the physical aspect, for example, coaching in
    sports domain. In my paper coaching focuses on the teaching skills,
    ie.questioning, how to writeing on the blackboard and so on. However, I
    think the skills also means the cognitive skills, how to think, and coaching
    in teacher education shoud deal with them. If so, coaching should not set
    limits to the physical aspect.
    On the other hand, the notion of mentoring is wide, and focuses on the human
    development through the professional development.
    I think the relationship between mentoring and coaching is similar to that
    between education and training. Education and training have the same
    terminal goal, but the learnig process is different. Training process is the
    most effective route to the goal, so at least the trainer has the check
    points to attain to the goal and the criteria of evaluation.  In education
    the leaner tries and fails many times and finally attains to the goal. In
    this process the educator support and sometimes instruct the learner and the
    learner is brought out his potential by the educator's support. I think
    training is necessary in educational process, but only training cannnot
    serve the learner's development.
   
    My answer to you question is that the skills involved in mentoring and
    coaching are in part the same because mentoring involves coaching.
    So I think we  need to reframe the skills in coaching from the view of
    mentoring.
   
   
    Warmest regards,
    Tadashi
   

Email has been scanned for viruses by Altman Technologies' email management service <http://www.altman.co.uk/emailsystems>

Bishop Grosseteste University College Lincoln values people and promotes equal opportunity.
The information contained in this E-mail is confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. Access to this E-mail by anyone other than the intended recipient is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose the E-mail or any part of its contents or
take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the Postmaster at [log in to unmask]" ymailto="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask] or telephone the IT Services Department on 01522 583664.
As Bishop Grosseteste University College Lincoln cannot accept responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of this E-mail or attachments, we recommend that you subject these to your virus checking procedures prior to use.

Email has been scanned for viruses by Altman Technologies' email management service - www.altman.co.uk/emailsystems