Australian researcher puts a figure on benefits
of Open Access to scientific and scholarly
information.
At the moment, research universities and
“universities of applied sciences” [hogescholen] pay millions of euros every
year for access to scientific and scholarly publications. Businesses, smaller hogescholen, and other organisations
often cannot afford the expensive licences needed for access. If the “Open
Access” model were to be applied globally, there would be increased access to
research results for both researchers and the public at
large.
The study Costs and Benefits of Research
Communication: The Dutch Situation compares three publication models. The
greatest advantage is offered by the Open Access model, which means that the
research institution or the party financing the research pays for publication
and the article is then freely accessible. Adopting this model could lead to an
annual saving of EUR 133 million. Even if the
The report concludes that the advantages would
not just be in the long term; in the transitional phase too, more open access to
research results would have positive effects.
The director of SURFfoundation, Wim Liebrand,
welcomed the results of Prof. Houghton’s study: “The study makes clear that
Open Access offers a realistic alternative to the traditional publisher’s model
based on licences. SURFfoundation has been working for some years now with
publishers, authors, scientists, and scholars to develop publication models that
are more cost-effective. Prof. Houghton’s report is a big boost for that
work.”
The study was commissioned by SURFfoundation
and forms part of a series of similar studies carried out in
The full text of the study can be downloaded from the SURFfoundation website:
Title: Costs
and Benefits of Research Communication: The Dutch
Situation
Authors: John Houghton, Centre for Strategic Economic
Studies,
SURFfoundation
Annette Peet
M +31 (0)6 12507877
Whizpr
Winnie Silvertand
T +31 (0)317 410 483