-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Nocarbontrade-l] CLEAN COAL TO SUPPORT UP TO 60,000 UK JOBS
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:31:06 +0200
From: Trusha Reddy <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>


CLEAN COAL TO SUPPORT UP TO 60,000 UK JOBS FYI -- you will have heard about UK govt announced targets on CCS. According to them, the targets are a way of ensuring that money is spent on the technology- so they’re hoping the demo sites will be ready! “You will see that the retrofit is only required if  "CCS is proven"-  a great loophole!”
 

-- Trusha



____________________________________________________________________________

CLEAN COAL TO SUPPORT UP TO 60,000 UK JOBS
Department of Energy and Climate Change17/06/2009 09:57

Consultation details conditions for new UK coal power stations
Clean coal technology could bring between £2-4 billion a year into the UK economy by 2030, and support between 30,000-60,000 in jobs such as engineering, manufacturing and procurement, according to new independent research published today.

The report, 'Future Value Of Coal Carbon Abatement Technologies To UK Industry' by AEA Group, is published today alongside the Government's consultation document 'A framework for the development of clean coal'.

As outlined by Ed Miliband to Parliament on 23 April, the consultation details how the Government proposes to reconcile the need to curb emissions of carbon from future coal fired power stations with the need to maintain a secure diverse energy mix.  It proposes:

Requiring CCS demonstration: New coal fired power stations should only be given consent in the UK if they demonstrate CCS on at least 300MW net (around 400MW gross) of capacity from day one.  Each demonstration project would have to store 20 million tonnes of CO2 over 10-15 years.  The proposed framework recognises that CCS demonstration will only proceed with Government intervention.  A financial incentive funded by electricity suppliers will support up to four commercial-scale CCS demonstrations in the UK.  Alongside the Government's ongoing competition to build a post-combustion demonstration, up to three further projects including pre-combustion technology could be supported.  The primary legislation required to implement this mechanism will be sought at the earliest possible opportunity.
Requiring CCS retrofit:  All new coal fired power stations should be required to retrofit CCS to their full capacity within five years of CCS being proven.  We are planning on the basis that this point will be reached by 2020, and an independent review, potentially led by the Environment Agency, would report in that year on the status of the technology. The consultation document also explores whether this requirement should apply to existing coal fired power stations.
Contingency: In the event that CCS takes longer than expected to be judged proven, further measures may be needed to ensure emissions from coal are substantially reduced.  These measures could include an annual cap on individual power stations' emissions, a limit on running hours or an emissions performance standard that would limit the amount of CO2 that could be emitted per unit of electricity generated.

Energy and Climate Change Secretary Ed Miliband said:

"The conditions we're proposing for new coal are the most environmentally ambitious of any country in the world, requiring the demonstration of CCS on a substantial proportion of any new power station and the 100% retrofit of CCS when it's proven. 

"At the same time, by providing funding for demonstrations, we can maintain coal as part of our energy mix, supporting diversity and therefore security of supply.

"By acting early, jobs will also be created as Britain develops the expertise in what could be a major new industry, with CCS projects offering the potential to form the hubs for clusters of low carbon industries.

"By driving the development of CCS in this country, we are also, as a country, playing an essential role in the battle against climate change."

Notes for editors

1. Coal currently accounts for 37% (29GW) of the UK's electricity capacity, generating 31% of the UK's electricity in 2008.

2. These proposals were first outlined to Parliament by Ed Miliband on 23 April.  His statement can be found at: www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/news/090423_ccs_sta/090423_ccs_sta.aspx

3. The consultation document is published alongside an Environmental Report and Impact Assessment.  Views are sought on all three documents and they are available at:
www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/consultations/open/open.aspx

4. The closing date for responses to the consultation is 9 September 2009. 

5. Also published today and available online are:
www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/what_we_do/uk_supply/energy_mix/ccs/ccs.aspx

"Future Value of Coal Carbon Abatement Technologies to UK Industry", AEA Technology, June 2009 
"Technical Analysis of CCS Transportation Infrastructure", Parson Brinckerhoff, May 2009 
"Developing a Regulatory Framework for CCS Transportation Infrastructure (Volume 1 & 2)", NERA Economic Consulting, May 2009

Department of Energy and Climate Change
3 Whitehall Place, London, SW1A 2HD
Press enquiries +44 (0)300 068 5226 Public enquiries +44 (0)300 060 4000
Textphone +44 (0)20 7215 6740 (for those with hearing impairment)





_______________________________

Carbon capture plans threaten shutdown of all UK  coal-fired power stations
Radical proposals to require existing plants,  including Drax, to fit the technology would force their closure, government  admits
Tim Webb  and Terry Macalister
guardian
.co.uk,      Wednesday 17 June 2009  18.54 BST

All of Britain's coal-fired power stations, including Drax, the country's largest emitter  of carbon, could be forced to close down under radical plans unveiled by  government today.

Ed Miliban
d, the energy secretary, is proposing to extend his plans to force companies  to fit carbon capture and storage technology (CCS) onto new coal plants - as  revealed by the Guardian - to cover a dozen existing coal plants.

The  consultation published by his Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC)  conceded that if this happened "we could expect them to close".

A  spokeswoman said that no decision had yet been made. The government could  instead decide to allow coal plants still open in 2020 to operate for a  limited period or to keep them in reserve to stop the lights going  out.

A spokesman for a company operating several coal plants in the UK  said that even if Miliband did not carry out his threat and force existing  coal plants to fit expensive CCS equipment, any further restrictions on their  operation would be likely to result in their closure. It will probably prove  too difficult and expensive to fit CCS to plants nearing the end of their  lifespan.

Drax is the UK's newest and biggest coal-fired station. The  Yorkshire plant, which provides about 8 per cent of Britain's electricity, is  technically able to continue to operate into the 2030s. But since it is 40  miles from the coast, transporting captured carbon for storage in the North  Sea would be particularly difficult.

Dorothy Thompson, chief executive  of Drax, accepted that the plant might eventually need to fit CCS but did not  say when this would be feasible or economic.

David Porter, head of  trade body the Association of Electricity Producers, said he welcomed CCS as a  way of making coal plants environmentally acceptable, but said existing  stations which could not fit the equipment should not be forced to close.  "There are already quite enough coal-fired plants coming off the system.  Security of supply should be taken seriously," he warned.

The Guardian  has also learnt that E.ON's controversial plans to build a new coal-fired  sta
tion in Kingsnorth -  the first in the UK for more than 20 years - are likely to be delayed by  several years at least. It would represent a temporary victory for  environmental campaigners, who staged last summer's climate camp near the Kent  site. The Kingsnorth plans could be scrapped altogether.

E.ON has  entered the new station into a government competition to build the first  commercial-scale CCS demonstration project. DECC has now admitted that the  decision to pick a winner has been delayed and will not take place until the  autumn of 2010 at the earliest. Miliband reiterated the government's ambition  to have the winning project operational in 2014.

E.ON is becoming  increasingly concerned about the tight schedule of four years to build its  first highly efficient coal plant in the UK which is also equipped with  experimental CCS technology. The delay in the competition could favour  Scottish Power's entry at Longannet, which involves attaching CCS to an  existing coal station.

Miliband told the Guardian that the short space  of time for E.ON to build a new plant was "one of the factors" which would  influence the decision but declined to comment further.

Paul Golby,  E.ON's chief executive, has admitted the firm would not build Kingsnorth if it  did not win the competition. Under Miliband's plans announced in April, all  new coal plants must fit CCS to part of the operation. Golby said it would not  be economic to do this without government subsidies and added that E.ON could  build a gas plant instead.

John Sauven, executive director of  Greenpeace UK, urged the government to make all existing coal plants fit CCS:  "If we fail to act, Drax will remain one of the largest sources of carbon  dioxide in the world for decades," he said. "The government's own advisors on  climate change have stated that all emissions from coal must cease by the  early 2020s.

"That's all coal, not just new coal, so it's vital that Ed  Miliband's new policy doesn't ignore the inconvenient truth that we need to  deal with the reality of Drax every bit as urgently as the threat of  Kingsnorth."





-----------

"Trees are poems that earth writes upon the sky. We fell them down and turn them into paper, that we may record our emptiness". - Kahlil Gibran

------------
Trusha Reddy
Senior Researcher: Climate Change Project
Corruption and Governance/Corruption et Gouvernance
Institute for Security Studies/ Institut d'Études de Sécurité
Cape Town, South Africa/Afrique du Sud
Tel: +27-(0)21- 461 7211
Fax: +27-(0)21- 461 7213
Cell: +27 (0)82 795 3135
Email: [log in to unmask]
Web Site:   http://www.issafrica.org
            http://www.ipocafrica.org

Disclaimer: This e-mail may contain information which is privileged and intended for the recipient only.  If you are not the intended recipient, please advise immediately, and do not disclose the contents, or take copies.

Rappel: Ce courriel pourrait contenir des renseignements qui ne concernent que le recepteur pour son strict usage personnel. Dans le cas ou vous ne serez pas ce recepteur indique, veuillez nous en avertir immediatement sans prendre connaissance du contenu, ni en faire des copies.



This e-mail may contain information which is privileged and intended for the recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise immediately, and do not disclose the contents, or take copies. / Rappel: Ce courriel pourrait contenir des renseignements qui ne concernent que le recepteur pour son strict usage personnel. Dans le cas ou vous ne serez pas ce recepteur indique, veuillez nous en avertir immediatement sans prendre connaissance du contenu, ni en faire des copies.