 |
 |
Thanks a lot! Mi Jung On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi, > > You will lose quality if you go to 8-bit - I would recommend > going to 32-bit instead. > > All the best, > Mark > > > On 11 May 2009, at 17:32, Mi Jung Kim wrote: > > Hi Mark, >> >> Thank you for your answer. Yes, my images unsigned 16bit. I will try to >> use as 8bit to see whether it works for my further analysis. >> >> Thanks a lot! >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Mi Jung >> >> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]> >> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> You cannot have an Analyze format image with 16 bit unsigned data. >> The only integer options in the Analyze format are unsigned 8-bit, >> signed 16-bit and signed 32-bit. With FSL we still restrict our outputs >> to these formats, but since you want an Analyze image then it is just >> not possible with any software. >> >> Are you sure that your images are unsigned 16-bit? If all of your >> values are between 0 and 32767 then it doesn't matter if it is >> signed or unsigned as they will represent the same thing. Check this >> first, and if it is the case then just stick with the 16-bit signed >> format. >> If not, then you'll need to convert to a 32-bit format to store it >> correctly in an Analyze file. >> >> All the best, >> Mark >> >> >> >> >> >> On 11 May 2009, at 16:34, Mi Jung Kim wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have raw images 16bit unsigned. I need to convert them to analyze >> format. >> I used fslcreatehd for that, but the output was 16bit signed. Is there any >> body who can help? >> >> Thanks, >> >> MJ >> >> >>