Print

Print


Hi,

What cost function are you using?
Have you tried different ones?
Also, do you start nearly aligned or in
quite different orientations?

All the best,
	Mark


On 1 May 2009, at 16:50, John Kuster wrote:

> Hello Hedok,
>
>   Our slices are about 5mm thick, 3.5x3.5 voxes, for 16 slices,  
> partial
> field, with no gap, but I have to check on the gap, it may be 1mm
> because of constraints.
>
>   Flirt basically worked well for most of our subjects, but failed  
> for a
> few. Do you think the resolution differences combined with the partial
> field may be putting flirt on the threshold of failing?  I have tried
> cleaning up the ASL scans by cropping the background using bet with
> f=.2.  This helped for a few, but not for the worst ones.  Then, I
> tried masking the original image and the result was similar with the
> same few failing.
>
>   I am basically at a loss as to how I can get flirt to work a little
> better.
>
> thanks for your input!
>
> Jake
>
>
>> Dear John,
>>
>> Just curious about your ASL(arterial spin labeling) image parameters.
>>
>> Do you acquire them with very thick slice(~7mm) with gap ~1mm?.
>> Is this partial or full brain coverage?
>>
>> I don't have much experience in ASL, but I remember it was quite
>> difficult to even coregister anatomical with perfusion weighted  
>> image.
>> Let me know how it goes.
>>
>> Hedok
>>
>> Jesper Andersson wrote:
>>> Dear John,
>>>
>>> just to add to Matt's previous comment.
>>>
>>>> I tried to run the following command,
>>>>
>>>> Command:
>>>> fnirt --ref=swap_CTRL02_T1.nii.gz --in=swap_CTRL02_ASL.nii.gz
>>>> --aff=CTRL02_ASL2T1_auto1.mat --cout=CTRL02_ASL2T1_auto2.mat
>>>
>>> From the names of your --ref and your --in file I am guessing you  
>>> are
>>> trying to register a subjects ASL scan to the same subjects
>>> T1-weighted structural scan. Is that correct?
>>>
>>> If so there are two issues:
>>> 1. Since it is the same subject you really only need 6 dof, i.e. all
>>> you need to do is to make sure the images are in the same  
>>> "position".
>>> 2. The contrast in an ASL image is very different from that of a
>>> T1-weighted image, something that fnirt would struggle with.
>>>
>>> Both these issues suggest that what you really need is flirt, and  
>>> that
>>> will run just fine on a 32bit machine.
>>>
>>> Good luck Jesper
>>
>>
>>
>