If the EA are now saying that PAH's and cyanide are being published by the end of June 2009, I hope this doesn't mean arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, nickel, dioxins and dioxin-like biphenols have now been further delayed!!
 
Their website still says the following, so I'm keeping my optimistic hat on for now...

During April, May and June 2009 we anticipate publishing reports for:

 

Gareth Wills
Project Manager, Communities
44-(0)117 9339 335

Think before you print

 


From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Clennell-Jones, Simon
Sent: 06 May 2009 15:08
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: CLEA timescales

FYI

 

The Environment Agency intends to publish toxicological and soil guideline value reports for cyanide and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, including benzo(a)pyrene, by 30 June, environment minister Huw Irranca-Davies told John Howell MP in a Commons written answer.

 

Hansard

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nik Reynolds
Sent: 06 May 2009 14:25
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: CLEA timescales

 

Just a thought - would it be advantageous for a motion to be put to the CLEA

team to produce tox reports in lieu of SGV values.  I think the general

consensus is that the SGV's have very limited use, however the tox reports

may allow us to undertake site specific risk assessments.  The SGV reports

are every detailed and obviously a lot of work goes into their production.

Maybe this can be diverted into the production of tox reports.

 

Having reviewed the variation in 1% SOM results of the current workbook for

all land uses based on the most conservative parameters (land use type and

soil), compared to previous threshold values, there is a massive potential

for 'unnecessary' disposal of soils which may be considered suitable in the

next few months/year.  Considering the current economic climate this could

make or break many developments currently being moth balled or the the edge

of viability.

 

Would it also be prudent, considering the revised concentrations which

appear to be suitable for use, to have acute thresholds also noted on the

risk assessment.

___________________________
NOTICE: This communication and any attachments ("this message") may contain confidential information for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized use, disclosure, viewing, copying, alteration,
dissemination or distribution of, or reliance on this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
message in error, or you are not an authorized recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to
this message, delete this message and all copies from your e-mail system and destroy any printed copies.