Print

Print


Dear All,

Tessa Pirnie, Angelos Hadjikoumis, Sarah Viner and I are planning to  
submit a session proposal on "Biometry and Morphology in  
Zooarchaeology" for the 2010 ICAZ conference in Paris. If you would be  
interested in presenting at this session we would be grateful if you  
could get in touch with us by April 27th. Please e-mail Kim Vickers  
on: [log in to unmask]

Measurements taken from archaeological animal bones have many  
applications in zooarchaeology, both methodological and as material  
culture evidence. We hope to encourage a range of papers and posters  
dealing with a wide cross section of archaeological applications,  
species, regions and periods!

Some of the broad subject areas covered by the scope of the session include:

* Theoretical and methodological issues in biometry
* the use of biometry to tackle methodological problems in zooarchaeology
* the effects of external factors (e.g: nutrition and environment) on
   animal size and shape
* animal domestication
* domesticate development
* Husbandry regimes and/or consumption patterns as indicators of culture,
   ideology, identity, movement etc
* papers on other biometrical issues are also welcome!

Many thanks for your time, we look forward to hearing from you!

Best wishes,

Kim Vickers


Session Abstract:

Analysis of the physical dimensions of animal bone within  
archaeological assemblages has a wide range of applications in the  
elucidation of human-animal relationships in the past. This session is  
intended to showcase new international developments in both the method  
and theory of biometry in zooarchaeology and its innumerable  
applications. It is expected that the range of papers included in this  
session will be varied, both in terms of subject matter – ranging from  
theoretical and methodological papers through to the use of biometry  
to address important archaeological issues- and chronological and  
geographical scope. Included within the remit of the session are  
developments in the use of biometry to tackle methodological problems  
in zooarchaeology – for example the differentiation of species, sex  
and breeds; as well as the potential of biometrical analysis to  
contribute to key archaeological questions such as animal  
domestication and subsequent development. The ways in which animals  
are husbanded and used by people are intrinsic aspects of cultural  
ideology. The evidence provided by biometry and animal morphology for  
changing husbandry regimes, animal populations, and consumption  
patterns has unlimited potential to inform us about culture, ideology,  
identity, trade, movement and transmission in the past. It is hoped  
that the range of papers from international contributors presented  
during this session will promote awareness of this rich, yet often  
overlooked aspect of zooarchaeology; and stimulate further discussion  
upon its use and potential.




------------------------------
Dr Kim Vickers
Department of Archaeology,
University of Sheffield,
Northgate House,
West Street,
Sheffield,
S1 4ET.

e-mail: [log in to unmask]