Print

Print


I haven't really been following this topic, but come on Joe, 1982 at  
least.

Tim A.

On 7 Apr 2009, at 18:19, Jon Corelis wrote:

> My own reaction to that site was unenthusiastic not because it was
> experimental but because it wasn't:  just looking it over I couldn't
> see a single idea that was later than 1972.
>
> As for the larger issue, of course my judgments on poetry have to be
> prescriptive, because I only like good poetry, so obviously if I like
> it it's good and if I don't it's not.  I'm surprised I have to explain
> this.
>
> -- 
> ===============================================
>
>   Jon Corelis    http://jcorelis.googlepages.com/joncorelis
>
> ===============================================