 |
 |
Nigel, Your clarification was eactly where I intended my comment to land. The increasing concern with linking actual real people's experiences with the discourses surrounding them is, to me, what "moments" are in Denzin and Lincoln's work. See, in particular, Denzin's interest in embedding his theoretical concerns within both his own and other's personal narratives. Comments? Jeff Friedman > > Dear all > > I am sorry to clog up emails. I perjaps could have made myself a lot > clearer in my original posting about Denzin and Lincolns 'moments'. In > their text Handbook of Quilaiotative Research second edition they describe > 'moments in qualitative resaerch: traditional, modernist, post modern, > blurred genres, crisis of representation. I am interested in p[eople ideas > about where performance as an approach would weave into their 'linear' > moments > > Thanks again and sorry if I was unclear > > best wishes > > nigel > > > > From: [log in to unmask] > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: soem help > Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:30:17 +0100 > > > > Dear all > I am working on a piece that considers what DEnzin and Lincold refer to as > the different 'moments' in qualitative research. I am wondering where > perfomative approaches might begin to make their contributions? I have an > idea that even though Denzin and Lincilns work implies a tight linear > chronology that this is not neccasarily representative of the continuous > blurs and tensions that continue to persist. > I would welcome any comments > Best for a holiday break (if you have one) > nigel > > > > Get the New Internet Explore 8 Optimised for MSN. Download Now > _________________________________________________________________ > View your Twitter and Flickr updates from one place – Learn more! > http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/137984870/direct/01/