Peter, thanks for this terrific input to our discussion.  I am also moved by Ralph's passionate cry for relevance and focused contribution in a moment of urgency.  Both have caused me to reflect on my own company's corporate interventions of the last 18 years, most of which have been for big robust companies (IBM, GE, Pfizer) whose innovation and leadership agendas were aimed at enhancing or fine tuning their already strong positions.  Only a few of our clients were in crisis, only a few were feeling desperate.  For the most part, positivity prevailed making it fairly easy for them to invite our novel creative approaches into their world.  Our work focused on their issues, proved effective and both our business and theirs continued to grow. 
 
Then one day, we were called into Washington DC to help the newly established Center for Excellence in Municipal Management cope with the re-training of several hundred municipal managers coming from the trenches of a completely failed local government.  A currupt mayor had been ejected and the city was now under Federal supervision.  The situation was critical and it was absolutely essential our training be immediately relevant to the disfunctional, demoralized state of our clientel.  Basically, we needed to reach into the painful interiors of these public servants and work with them toward hope, purpose, motivation, values, and new learning -- things we know underlie functionality and excellence in performance.  All we had to offer were our art forms, our arts-based processes for inquiry and personal development plus every ounce of humanity and compassion we could stir into the mix.  The first iteration of our programming worked astonishingly well.  Our second and third iterations really hit the mark and our contract for this work was renewed annually for six years. 
 
A second, even more urgent project, brought us to New Orleans to work with the exhausted Red Cross workers two years after Hurricane Katrina.  You probably know how desperate and abandoned those heroic workers felt by then.  We were paired with the George Washington University Center for Crisis Management and consultants from the University of Maryland.  If you would like to read about this high stakes assignment, just click on this link to an article from our Journal for the Arts and Organizational Learning by Canadian consultant and commentator David Creeelman: http://www.creativeleaps.org/news/200804/LiberalArtsAndBusiness.htm
 
The point I'm making here is that our arts-based practices - that is, the practices of our field, not just my company - operate in the realm of values, purpose, character, emotion, imagination and possibilities.  They can deeply impact the bottom lines of clients, but via powerfully indirect channels and often with a considerable lag time as our human systems process this level of transformation.  Ralph is right that this a difficult conversation to have with someone who is drowning and gasping for air.  That circumstance requires, if possible, some kind of instant rescue from a life guard figure with very specialized training suited to the moment.  I don't think we would be right in attempting to cast ourselves in that role. (Nor do I believe most of us do)  However, we do have the very real potential to save lives and companies through a wider, deeper engagement with the people who comprise them.  This is what we do.  This is our relevance.
 
So, how do we tell this story in our conversations with CEOs, Chief Learning Officers and HR directors?  In a moment of panic, it's difficult for anyone to hear anything that doesn't sound like a life guard rushing to their aid.   Hoping for your thoughts...
 
John
 
 
John J. Cimino, Jr.
President & CEO
Creative Leaps International
The Learning Arts
88 Hardscrabble Road, Chester, NY 10918
845-469-7254 (office)  845-216-0607 (cell)
[log in to unmask]  www.creativeleaps.org
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Peter Hanke
To: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 3:20 AM
Subject: [SPAM] Re: actualisation

Nice debate - 

Perhaps you would be interested in some notes from the recent CAL event.

This week the Center for Art & Leadership at Copenhagen Business School invited a roundtable discussion (Ole Fogh Kirkeby, Shannon O'Donnell, Daniel Hjorth, Sψren Friis Mψller, Rob Austin, Henrik Hermansen, Karen Humle, Karen Dyhr, Peter Hanke and a guest Mark Payne) on the following subject:

- What can art do for business in the crisis? or “How does the leader remain standing during the crisis”

It enabled a pretty interesting discussion on the philosophy of "stand" - opposed to "move" and and developed into a survey on the aesthetic values' ability to sharpening sensitivity and serenity for the leader as well as an opportunity to go under the surface and search for purpose instead of another rush for the next consumer-trend. The crisis has a potential to enable the mindful leader to replace plans and strategies with purpose and sustainability.

Some of the keywords:

What characterises the ability to Stand steadily in the Now and meet the emptiness of the event, because you cannot (and nobody else can) predict the future? A consequence of this is to deliberately replace Plans with Purpose.

Homo Oeconomicus vs. the Passionate Individual. Can we consider a purpose-driven economy?

Look upon Needs instead of Wants scaled up on society or global level. 
A fight between the Carnival and the Lent embodiment of being. To what extend is it a good idea to resist and discipline yourself, and to what extend is imagination and fabulation relevant?

Using the concept of growth as a lens instead of a goal (3rd world need conventional growth other parts need a new concept of growth)

Models replaced by Examples, i.e. every model implies a reduction of reality whereas the example gives us the focused glimpses of map and landscape 1:1 with no loss of aesthetic impact.

Models replaced by  Frames of understanding - enables the artistic interpretations of organisational reality

Models replaced by Plots. We have 2500 years of experience with plots given the ancient Greek drama tradition. The Fable in action.



I think that the discussion on "How to Persuade the Business Manager to Take Art Seriously" in some of the responses in this aacorn debate needs a sidestep away from the trap of Utility. Artful approaches are not tools - they are attitudes and an emotional-intellectual life-form. In our experience it will be far more fruitful to insist on the reflective modes (yet more demanding) and imbed the artistic and aesthetic aspects in the mutual endeavour, no matter where your starting point might be - artist, researcher, manager, non-profit organiser etc. This is not a fight between Theory and Practise - it is Mindfulness vs. Quick Fix.

Best regards

Peter



Peter Hanke
Exart Performances
C.L.Ibsens Vej 39
DK-2820 Gentofte
+45 31121108
www.exart.org



Den 02/04/2009 kl. 1.24 skrev Stager Jacques, Leslie:

My two cents would be that I hope as we are able to intervene in organizations, we are costing the benefits for our clients.  If we expect to sit at the table with CEOs, CFOs, CIOs, etc, then we need to be able to speak their language – now more than ever – and that’s numbers. 
I believe that the arts are a necessity in all the arenas of our life, as they open and build cognitive paths for new ideas.  (I have evidence to back this up, but not going down the grounded theory route here).  That said, we still need to be able to speak the language of the culture in which we are working.  Speaking the language provides credibility as well as allowing our audience to “hear” us. 
FYI:  a good book to start with if you haven’t done this sort of thing is:
Costing Human Resources:  The Financial Impact of Behavior in Organizations
By Wayne Cascio
(1982) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
We have long secluded the arts from the other areas of our society’s functioning rather than embracing it as an integral part of our operation as humans.  Now more than ever, we need to use the benefits of a creative process to break through the reified barriers that are holding this culture hostage.  I see this time as the supreme opportunity in our lifetime – much like our parents grappled with WWII and the Depression. 
As a new member to AACORN myself, I find this discussion stimulating and exciting.  Yes, as one member stated previously, through debate and conversation, we are engaging and finding our process, too.  I’m honored to be a part of so many thoughtful and practical (at the same time!) colleagues!
Ok, this ended up being more than two cents…
leslie
Leslie Stager Jacques, PhD
Lecturer 
Department of Management & International Business 
Massey University, Albany Campus 
Private Bag 102 904, North Shore MSC 
Auckland 
New Zealand 
Email [log in to unmask] 
Phone + 64 9 414 0800 Ext. 9420

From: Aesthetics, Creativity, and Organisations Research Network [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ralph Kerle
Sent: Thursday, 2 April 2009 2:24 a.m.
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: actualisation
Hi Sue,
With all due respects, let's leave the rhetoric out about opportunities at the moment.I get emails from the erudite through to spam daily exhorting me to adopt new thinking, new design processes and thinking, creativity and innovation programmes, arts based processes etc that will lead me out of this mess.
After two weeks of interviewing CEO's in middle to large corporations in Australia around leadership, creativity and innovation, I can categorically state where business is focused.
Back to basic business fundamentals particularly revenues that are dropping rapidly in every industry regardless; prices, costs and head counts and the cutting of all surplus expenditure especially those to do with what are perceived as non essential services such as training, O&D, HR where outcomes cannot be calculated and expressed in hard and fast monetary terms.
I found that as opposed to 12 months ago, at least the CEO's are now prepared to listen. They acknowledge they don't know where things are going. They want creative conversations. However, in all the discussions without exception they ask to be shown the tangible outcomes art based processes and creativity and innovation programmes etc will have on their bottom line in order to help them make their figures so their people can retain their jobs!! It's that focused!
Senior management is not interested in theorising, they are seeking practical financial outcomes..NOW..it is a matter of survival. So here is the challenge for all of us as I see it involved in this field. 
How does one respond to that from an aesthetic, creativity and organisations research perspective?
Ralph

ralph kerle 
chairman 
the creative leadership forum 
http://www.thecreativeleadershipforum.com 
p 612 9403 5327 m 0412 559 603






From: Aesthetics, Creativity, and Organisations Research Network [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sue Congram
Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2009 9:41 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: actualisation
I agree with these sentiments - that there is an opportunity for the arts to have a positive affect on the current economic situation.
I hear time and time again from people in business that there is a need to be 'creative' in order to survive. I hear that as both an inward (how we work) and outward (products and services) statement. My interest is in the extent to which the arts can create paradigm shifts in business, because that is what I believe is needed in order to take business minds into new ways of thinking. To achieve that at a cognitive-thinking level invites the old paradigm to keep it's bag of tricks active, making change difficult. In my view the arts can offer incredibly effective ways to create sustainable paradigm shifts in the way that people engage in leadership, management and business practice (in both the HOW and the WHAT) stepping around old established patterns which no longer work.
Is it the case that there is a window of opportunity open right now that will close soon? If so what does it mean to build on the opportunity that is open to us?
Interested in your thoughts on this.
Sue
Bringing imagination to life and work
–––––––––––––––
Sue Congram C.Psychol
Dolgarren
St Weonards
Herefordshire
HR2 8NZ 
01981 580040
–––––––––––––––––
 'Education and Imagination' Edited by Raya Jones, Austin Clarkson, Sue Congram, Nick Stratton, published by Routledge 
–––––––––––––––––
On 31 Mar 2009, at 17:43, Taylor, Steven S. wrote:


I'm with John in that I think the financial crisis is an opportunity for
arts-based thinking/work.  As we start to move beyond the initial panic
responses and start to look for new practices that may be better suited to
working with the complexities of the world the arts offers a lot.

- Steve


On 3/31/09 9:51 AM, "John Cimino" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


Jόgen,
Thanks for reviving your timely question.  There are probably many unique
responses to the economic crisis from within our profession.  Many of my
American colleagues are impacted by their major clients' withdrawal into a
reactive state of innovation dormancy and short-term thinking.  We believe
this protective mode will soon produce its own problems.  Creativity,
innovation and artful thinking are needed now more than ever.  Some of us
practitioners are endeavoring to position ourselves in anticipation of this
second realization, that creativity holds at least some of the keys to working
ourselves out of the mire of the present economy.  I also find more and more
pracitioners turning to one another in what feels like a very healthy
dialogue, establishing bonds of friendship and a level of sharing more rare in
prosperous times.  I experience this as a silver lining to the present crisis,
something from which much good may come.
Secondly, I also perceive at least some of our arts/aesthetics dialogue
merging with the dialogue around "design thinking" which may result in some
healthy cross-fertilization and a strenghtening of the cases for both in the
wider world.  
I look forward to your comments and others as well.  Our own community might
well be strengthened by this dialogue.  Best.
John
John J. Cimino, Jr.
President & CEO
Creative Leaps International
845-469-7254 (office)  845-216-0607 (cell)
www.creativeleaps.org <http://www.creativeleaps.org>


Steven S. Taylor, PhD
Associate Professor
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Department of Management
100 Institute Rd
Worcester, MA 01609
USA
+1 508-831-5557
[log in to unmask]