Print

Print


Hi,
     Can you let me know which version of fsl you are using and the  
contents of your design.con and design.mat files?

Many Regards

Matthew

> Hello list,
>
> I've just run a multiple regression with tbss on some skeletonised  
> FA data in a single group of subjects using 3 EVs - age, 1 target  
> behavioural variable and 1 potentially confounding behavioural  
> measure. I created a design matrix with the 3 normalised EVs, and  
> orthogonalised the target EV with respect to age and the confounding  
> EV. I assumed this would show me the changes in FA attributable to  
> the target EV with the other 2 covaried out. This was using  
> randomise and the TFCE option. When I display the  
> tbss_tfce_corrp_tstat contrast image in fslview with the -b 0.95,1  
> threshold, most of the skeletonised data appears to correlate with  
> the target variable. This is the case even when I use a more  
> conservative 0.99,1 threshold.
>
> I found this a little surprising, so ran the same design again  
> without orthogonalising the target EV. The results were virtually  
> the same.
>
> So I guess the question is, have I done anything wrong here?
>
> thanks in advance,
>
> Greig
>
>
>
> --
> Dr Greig de Zubicaray  |  fMRI Laboratory
> Centre for Magnetic Resonance  |  University of Queensland  |   
> Brisbane, QLD 4072  |  AUSTRALIA
> Phone:   +61-7-3365-4250  (direct)   |  +61-7-3365-4100   
> (reception)  |  Fax:  +61-7-3365-3833
> Email:    [log in to unmask]  |   Web:   http://www.fmrilab.net/
> CRICOS Provider Number 00025B
>