Dwy ddim yn gwybod am unrhyw
gyfieithiad, ond i gyfleu ‘terrorism’ ydy ‘brawychiaeth’
yn well dewis efallai, am ei fod yn fwy penodol?
Dim ond ‘brawychiaeth’ sydd
gan Geiriadur yr Academi ar gyfer ‘terrorism’, ac mae’n cadw ‘terfysg’
i’w restru o dan ‘riot’. Yn yr un cofnod, mae’n rhoi ‘y
Ddeddf Derfysg’ ar gyfer y ‘Riot Act’, felly fe allai fod yn
anodd iawn i rywun weld y gwahaniaeth rhwng y Ddeddf Derfysg a’r Ddeddf
Terfysgaeth pe na baen ni’n defnyddio ‘brawychiaeth’.
Oddi wrth/From:
Anfonwyd/Sent: 08 Chwefror 2009
17:07
At/To:
[log in to unmask]
Pwnc/Subject: Deddf Terfysgaeth
2000
Part 1 of the Terrorism Act 2000 - contains the following
interpretation
Tybed a oes cyfieithiad
lled-swyddogol o'r isod neu ran ohono? Ni allaf ddod o hyd i unrhywbeth
ar wefan OPSI, dim ond dyfynnu ychydig ohono ar flog rhywun. Yn ddelfrydol, mae
arna i angen gwybod erbyn diwedd bore dydd Llun, er y bydd modd imi ddiwygio fy
ngyfieithiad fy hun yn nes ymlaen yn y proflenni os bydd rhaid.
Diolch,
Ann
“1 (1) In
this Act “terrorism” means the use or threat of action where -
(a) the
action falls within subsection (2),
(b) the
use or threat is designed to influence the government or to intimidate the
public or a section of the public,
and
(c) the use
or threat is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious or
ideological cause.
(2) Action
falls within this subsection if it
(a) involves
serious violence against a person,
(b) involves
serious damage to property,
(c) endangers
a persons life, other than the person committing the action,
(d) creates
a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the
public,
(e) is
designed to interfere with or seriously disrupt an electronic system.
(3) The
use or threat of action falling within subsection (2) which involves the use of
firearms or explosives is terrorism whether or not subsection 1(b) is
satisfied.”