 |
 |
Peter, >but this does leave the institutes that have already upgraded with an >awkward manual reversal procedure. >My suggestion of just releasing an higher numbered rpm with the bug >removed was not favoured. having looked at the talk, it seems that sites which have already upgraded will be provided with a recipe for the manual procedure for rollback. It is not clear why copying the old version back as a newer version and letting everyone just update to the "current" version is not favoured. There is certainly no suggestion that it is not technically feasible, and if it is feasible any other course seems perverse. Paul