Thank you for your quick answers!
@Yasser.
I am sorry, but with this new version, it is the same.
The underlying image is the ouptut of native SPM5 segmentation (spm_segment), which as far as I am correct, is also used by ibaspm, right?
No, the input is not skullstripped.
@Marko
"an additional "cleanup" procedure that may be too aggressive on your data"
Yes, that is what I was looking for!
I tried with different HMRF values (0, 0.3, 0.45), but this does not change a lot.
@Steve
The normalisation is perfect, i.e. it matches exactly the one from native SPM.
I am sure that it must be something very simple I have so far overlooked, but what? ;-)
Thank you so much for your help!
Markus
2009/1/30 Yasser Aleman
<[log in to unmask]>
Dear Markus:
Here
I am sending to you our last version. I am preparing a new web page to
put it as soon as possible. I am also preparing a quick guide for users.
I
was checking your image and I can see lot of skull tissue in your gray
matter segmentation. Can you please tell me if your native image have
skull stripped or not?
Best regards
Yasser
2009/1/30 Marko Wilke
<[log in to unmask]>
Maybe the answer's in the title of the Bookstein paper ;-)
Best,
Marko
--
=====================================================================
Marko Wilke (Dr.med./M.D.)
[log in to unmask]
Universitäts-Kinderklinik University Children's Hospital
Abt. III (Neuropädiatrie) Dept. III (Pediatric neurology)
Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 1, D - 72076 Tübingen
Tel.: (+49) 07071 29-83416 Fax: (+49) 07071 29-5473
=====================================================================
--
Dr. med. Markus Gschwind, M.D.
Laboratory for Neurology and Imaging of Cognition
Dept of Neurosciences
University Medical Center (CMU)
1 Michel-Servet - 1211 GENEVA - CH
Tel 0041 (0) 22 379 5324
Fax 0041 (0) 22 379 5402
email: [log in to unmask]
http://labnic.unige.ch
