 |
 |
Hello Neil, It's not a silly question and one where we at the office do have a preference: Comb Binding. It's compact (so saves on postage) and it's still possible to re-organize and, if necessary, insert material. I hope the Board Members agree with me on this. Ring binders can get damaged after a few postings and are quite bulky. The clear plastic wallets can also mean pages slip about and may not be so easy to read as they are reflective (in the wrong way. We want you to be reflective not the pages). Don't panic if you've already submitted using ring binders and plastic wallets, they're still acceptable under the Chartership regulations. Good luck Michael Michael Martin MCLIP Adviser, Qualifications and Professional Development CILIP: the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals 7 Ridgmount Street London WC1E 7AE 020 7255 0625 [log in to unmask] -----Original Message----- From: list for CILIP members working towards MCLIP status [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Neil Ford Sent: 30 January 2009 13:50 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Preferred binding for portfolios Hi - are there any assessors out there? If so, what is your preferred binding for submitted portfolios. I've heard some candidates say that it's ok to submit in a ring binder or slide binder but others have said that you prefer spiral bound. I'm sure I've seen this written somewhere but can't seem to put my finger on it - sorry if it's a silly question. Neil