Print

Print


Hi,
     If you use the -1 mode, randomise will create a single EV which is a column of ones, as well as single contrast of 1. The files appended with _tstat1 and _tstat2 correspond to the 1st and 2nd contrasts respectively ( 1 and -1 in your case ). The files ending in _corrp_tstat<number> are the ones corrected for multiple comparisons ( in this case you will get _tfce_corrp_tstat<number> files since TFCE was used) the randomise manual at

http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/randomise/index.html

has information on using other clustering options ( -c and -C )

Many Regards

Matthew

Hello
I am a bit confused about the ideal way to use randomize for a single group design.
My goal is to test for correlations between FA and % signal change in an ROI
Based on the exchanges that I found on the forum which matched my goals, I used the GLM gui to generate a design matrix (with EV1 as the demeaned % signal change and group set to 1) and a contrast matrix (with 1 and -1, to check for both positive and negative correlations).
I ran the standard randomise command:
randomise -i all_FA_skeletonized -o tbss –m mean_FA_skeleton_mask -d design.mat -t design.con -m <mask_image> -D -n 500 - -T2 –V
 
However, I recently came across the instructions in the TBSS website which says that for a single group simple design, one does not have to use a design or contrast file.
But the website also says that “randomise will automatically select one-sample mode for appropriate design/contrast combinations”.
So here are my questions:
1. Have I done the correct analysis? Should I use: randomise -i OneSamp4D -o OneSampT -1 -v 5 –T (should I use - - T2 here?)
2. If the GLMgui based analysis is indeed correct, then do the output files tstat1 and tstat 2 reflect the 1 and -1 contrasts that I specified?
3. Which output file should I pass for cluster thresholding for multiple comparisons?
4. How do I export the FA vs EV1 correlation data from a cluster that shows a significant correlation?
 
Many thanks as always
Cibu Thomas