Print

---

----- Original Message -----

From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Jeffrey, Grant

To: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]

Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:32 PM

Subject: [COMMUNITYPSYCHUK] The CP Community

In response to comments from Alison, Annie and many other voices interested in developing a more organised CP Network:

 

Like Annie I would like to be part of a more participatory, inclusive, collective/ co-operative, one that might complement a BPS section.  We CAN create a community that prefers the positive, the multiple, difference over uniformity, and that emphasises proliferation, juxtaposition and disjunction over pyramidal hierarchy,

 

With the best will in the world, the list is a very limited medium and is not sufficiently robust to allow rapid development and evolution of CP ideas and action. It has also shown itself to be, on occasions at least, dominated by bad tempered voices which alienate some list members, and vulnerable to appropriation by anyone who feels they have the authority or 'right' to represent the entire list.  I think we can work much more effectively by moving from relying solely on what amounts to a broadcast media (one to many), to networked media (many to many). I think this kind of email list is already a little bit 'old fashioned', and having been involved in email lists since the inception of Jisc-Mail, it seems to me that this kind of communication is often plagued by flame wars, or by a just a few voices dominating the entire scene.

 

We can easily and quickly establish an online hub for the community psychology network.  All that is needed is a suitable domain name and some web space. Within that domain there can be a wide range of levels of interaction and activity (including critical and political activity etc). Once a static front page with a modest amount of dynamic content (probably using blog software to allow for posting announcements etc) is established it can then support a mass of more sophisticated dynamic content (developed by any interested parties) which might include:-

 

:   The list!

 

:  Discussion software for conventional web based threaded discussion (which functions in quite a different way from the list – the list is, practically, un-threaded, just check the subject headings and content of postings). 

 

:  A wiki – which, if carefully organised is ideal for us in a number ways (it is an extremely collective way to work) but in particular because of the diversity of information and stable content it can sustain.  I have some experience with Wikis and am an enthusiast.

 

:  A social networking function (not easy to choose the right software for this kind of thing but there is a lot of potential for the people on the list to get to know one another much better).

 

:  Web pages….which might in the long term include resources, book reviews, articles, campaign activity etc. basically anything people want.  It would be important to link to the excellent static web pages already out there.

 

:  Perhaps also the kind of survey/consultation software that Paul was suggesting in earlier postings and which might provide a framework for us to make collective decisions.

 

 There are many other terrific tools available online now, Twitter, Deli.icio.us etc

 

A web site that is a networking resource for us all and a public face for CP would add credibility to the movement as a whole and may help it develop and grow, providing a first stop for interested members if the public, students, the press etc.

I could help in terms of organising and maintaining the domain and coding a basic starter site, or just by setting up one of the above services, but the whole task would require a few volunteers to set up properly..  There would be lots of opportunities for interested individuals to use our collective space in ways that they personally prefer. The 'hub' would need some form of 'management' eventually were it to be successful, but at least to begin with there is nothing to stop an enthusiastic group of us trying something out and seeing how it goes. There is much to gain and little to lose in trying, and no shame if it fails!.

 

Would love to know what people think, either pro or con the suggestion.

 

Best wishes, Grant

Napier University is the best modern university in Scotland* and number one in Scotland for graduate employability**
(*Guardian University Guide 2009)
(**HESA 2008)

This message is intended for the addressee(s) only and should not be read, copied or disclosed to anyone else out-with the University without the permission of the sender.
It is your responsibility to ensure that this message and any attachments are scanned for viruses or other defects. Napier University does not accept liability for any loss or damage which may result from this email or any attachment, or for errors or omissions arising after it was sent. Email is not a secure medium. Email entering the University's system is subject to routine monitoring and filtering by the University.
Napier University is a registered Scottish charity. Registration number SC018373
 

___________________________________ COMMUNITYPSYCHUK - The discussion list for community psychology in the UK. To unsubscribe or to change your details visit the website: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=COMMUNITYPSYCHUK For any problems or queries, contact the list moderator: Grant Jeffrey ([log in to unmask])