Print

Print


--- On Sun, 12/28/08, [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Message
 
Aletheia, 
thanks again as always for the interesting links.  It was fascinating to 
see pictures of Somaliland, even if those included in the slide show were 
heavily weighted toward traffic jams and depressing concrete buildings. 

gladly my friend
this is great fun for me anyway

indeed rather than jams or depression 
what i saw & heard there was a vibrant & hopeful if slightly crimped reality
standing tall by sheer self determination
in sharp contrast to the prevailing helplessness & moonscape elsewhere in somalia

 
You write (I 
am truncating as instructed) 

i appreciate that
it is not easy to keep trimming the tree & retuning the instruments
but well worth it for the life of the party

that there is today no place outside the international territorial 
& boundary system to resettle & rehabilitate pirates as pompey could so 
easily do except perhaps for marie byrd land & a few guano rocks.  
Fair enough.  In another story, 
Plutarch tells how the young Caesar was hijacked by pirates.  This was long 
before he was the leading man of Rome. He arranged for ransom, and told them he 
would be back to kill them all.  They thought it was bravado, but he 
equipped an expedition, went back, captured them all, and put them in the Roman 
prison at Pergamum.  When the local Roman governor dithered around "and 
kept saying that he needed time to look into the case, Caesar paid no further 
attention to him. He went to Pergamum, took the pirates out of prison and 
crucified the lot of them, just as he had often told them he would do when he 
was on the island and they imagined he was joking."  Plutarch, "Life of 
Caesar," §2. 
 
I 
would be satisfied with either approach.  Maybe crucifying them is extreme, 
but hanging them aboard the ship that captures them is not -- that was the 
practice for centuries and should be resumed.  And once hanging them, I 
would not be too quick to cut them down, either.  Moslem practice requires 
bathing a corpse, and enshrouding it, and burying it in alignment with 
Mecca.  Deliberately omitting these formalities might have a deterrent 
effect, as pinning the heads of highwaymen to town gates used to do.  
All this may seem atavistic, but so is piracy -- not part of the modern 
civilized world.

yes lets be modern & civilized about this

but when you talk about destruction
dont you know that you can count me out

& going out of ones way to disrespect the dead & or offend the living
doesnt seem very becoming either
of the world i would prefer to cocreate

 
One 
reason the European navies are reluctant to detain pirates is the thought that 
they would have to give them a full-dress European trial, with appointed counsel 
and bail and appeals and so on.  That is not necessary in this context,on 
the high seas.  Pirates caught on board a hijacked vessel could be tried by 
the captain of the capturing ship, or before a board of her officers.  Any 
ship suspected of piracy could be hailed and boarded, as was done in 
earlier anti-piracy and anti-slavery campaigns, by the British and many other 
nations.  If the ship tries to evade boarding, it may be sunk.  If 
once boarded there is evidence of piracy (why would an innocent fishing vessel 
need rocket-propelled grenade launchers, for example?) the captain and his 
officers can make their own judgment.  This is on the high seas, of course 
-- in territorial waters other considerations might obtain.  But 
international law allows pirates to be tried anywhere -- they could be delivered 
to the nearest place not under pirate control, as the Indian naval ship did by 
delivering their prisoners for trial in Yemen.  There is no need to land 
them on the beach at Eyl, where they will be honored as brave pirates and 
treated to a feast celebrating their escape from the foolish 
Europeans.
 
You are completely right that in the present 
case the piracy is just the familiar petty warlordism transferred to a maritime 
venue by former fishermen & other unemployed & devastated people of a 
warlord nation whose legitimate livelihoods in every case were first despoiled 
& plundered by outsiders next to whom btw they & their onshore warlord 
counterparts are sweetness & light by 
comparison.  But when transferred to a maritime 
venue, 
then it becomes a world problem and not just a local one

do you really assume the somalian failed state is just a local problem

& perhaps only a peculiarly local aberration at that

& that the pirates have merely overstepped the boundary of their local failure & dysfunction 
& have bumbled thereby into the fully functional & successful global state of international law

& that by doing so 
they have somehow lost yet again their previously forfeited integrity

the nerve of them enlarging such already total failure like that

have they lost their minds as well as their country

how dare they act so globally while thinking so locally
& locoly
when only the bigs are supposed to do that

, 
and all the nations of the world have a right and indeed a duty to suppress it 
vigorously.  

yikes a duty to suppress
really
when suppression only empowers 
& in fact creates the opposite of what is intended

please spare us all forever from such a heavy & self defeating duty

And indeed the same could be said, although with much less 
precedent and international authority, for the anarchy and warlordism on land in 
Somalia.  
 
I realize this is getting rather far away from boundary 
issues. 

ahh but do you really think so

for it seems to me you are finally arriving here at what this entire discussion of nearly 3 weeks may well have been groping toward
as it evolved from african boundary maintenance to somaliland self determination to piracy control

for in our modern & civilized world
any failed state 
but especially a perennial or recurrent one 
is a failure not so much of that state as of our sovereign territorial state system as a whole
as underwritten & buttressed by our boundary law & practices

yes our modern & civilized world itself is the primary failed state

& thats what needs to be corrected first & foremost

& happily all it needs is just a dab more self determination 
wherever & whenever & however possible

or in other words
allowing & even encouraging what comes naturally anyway

the sovereignty & integrity of human beings acting decently 
as they so often do
are far higher & grander & more effective than the sovereignty & integrity of states behaving badly
as they so often do

so it seems we just need to civilize & modernize a bit