Print

Print


Ian

Well as we know, the DPA does not cover dead people, however, even if the DPA did cover the dead for period after death, surely under the "DPA framework" this would just delay trying to sort out the deceased person's affairs?  I don’t agree that the DPA should be extended to dead people for any length of time. This scenario as I understand it, is a misinterpretation of DPA and retraining needs to be had and processes changed if necessary.  This is however, just my opinion.

Many thanks
Regards
Trish Bailey MSc

         

-----Original Message-----
From: This list is for those interested in Data Protection issues [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
Sent: 28 November 2008 13:50
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: You must be joking... Food for thought on a quite Friday.

A brief example of how not to do it.

1. 18.10.2008 a death in the family:

2. 20.10.2008 Checked online with one company to see if it was 
possible to cancel a service provision - nothing available 

online (possibly understandably).

3. Telephoned the premium rate customer service line, explained the 
situation and asked them to cancel the account in early 

November and if they could produce a final bill for the end of that 
billing in early November period which would facilitate 

their bank direct debit payment, simplifying the process for them and 
the executors. Was asked to post a copy of the death 

certificate to the company.

4. 20-21/10/2008 access to the on-line billing information part of the 
service terminated so was unable to properly validate 

costs.

5. 22/10/2008 Obtained death certificates. Posted covering letter copy 
of death certificate to the company providing a date 

for the complete cessation of the service and to facilitate 
finalisation of the estate of the deceased.

6. Received by registered mail the covering letter and copy of the 
death certificate (no compliments slip or anything else 

included) at the home address of the executor to the deceased.

7. 5/11/2008 Received at the home address of the executor a 
standardised condolence letter asking if the account needed to be 

cancelled to call and cancel. (Took no action as already cancelled).

8. 24/11/2008. Received standard correspondence addressed to the 
deceased (and redirected by the post office) 
   
	(a) Advising that part of the service provision was being transferred 
and stating the deceased should contact the 

company to stop that transfer if they had not arranged for it (We 
assume the new occupants (who are known to us) of the house 

were doing that) and that it was possible the deceased could accrue 
additional costs.
   
	(b) Red reminder for an outstanding account balance showing the total 
amount but no detail.

9. 24/11/2008. Acting on behalf of executor (who was rather upset 
again) contacted the premium rate number provided by the 

company to find out the details of the outstanding balance and to 
arrange payment.  
   
Call centre	- I am sorry but due to the data protection act I cannot 
speak to you about this account.
   
Caller 	- Would you please note that on the account or details of this 
call. Would you also tell me what time it is at the 

moment.
   
Call centre 	- Gave the time.
   
Caller       - Can I confirm your are aware the account holder is 
dead?
   
Call centre  - Just a moment please.  A pause of some moments/a 
minute.  Yes there is a note on the record.
   
Caller	- I have received two letters today, one of which is an unpaid 
outstanding balance billing reminder. But the details 

of the bill are unknown could your clarify the detai?
   
Call centre  - Clarified some of the detail but unable to fully 
clarify as the figures did not make sense.
   
Caller       - Thank you.

   
24/11/2008   - Contacted the premium rate customer service line.
   
Caller 	- I wish to make a complaint. Details of the process to date 
explained and asked for clarification of the total 

amount.
   
Call centre	- That amount explained in more detail, but would/could 
not provide writted copy
   
Caller	- Started to pay the bill and asked for assurance that this was 
the finalised outstanding balance and that all 

correspondence with the deceased would cease.
   
Call centre	- No, a further amount is due next month for further 
outstanding costs.
   		  Those costs added to the current amount and paid.
   
Call centre  - To sort this out I have had to re-enable the account. 
Would you please call back in 3 days to disable it 

again.
  
Caller	- No. Sorting this out to this stage has already cost a minimum 
of £3.90 in call charges. This is precisely the type 

of poor and inflexible organisational administrative process the 
complaint is about and I see no reason why the estate should 

be burdened with further costs in improving your organisational 
processes. The organisation has been made aware of the death 

of the account holder a number of times.  
Would you please let me know how my complaint is finalised.


A plea to the group. Look to your organisations processes to attempt 
to limit this type of distress, if only to stop your own 

organisation from incurring ongoing costs in servicing deceased 
persons, which I thought was the remit of whichever god 

people prefer to defer to!  Also, the organisation is arguably still 
liable under DP, the executor, whose details were 

somewhere in the deceased computer file, continues as a living 
individual, and is the person the organisation would no doubt 

eventually chase through the courts for billing purpose, if anybody 
ever gets to that stage. Their data is not being 

processed in accordance with the principles.  Food for thought maybe.


Whilst this was the worst computer/organisationally generated example 
experienced during this time it was not the most 

insensitive.
That one was purely person generated, so remember when reveiwing 
processes that human error can also damage organisations and 

an appropriate level of training is required.

Meanwhile my own experiences have merely served to increase the 
strength of my personal belief that notwithstanding the 

difficulties, DP should continue to cover the data of deceased for an 
appropriately specified period following death.


Ian W



Get 50% off Hotel Bookings ftom Tiscali - http://www.tiscali.co.uk/travel
__________________________________________________________

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
      available to the world wide web community at large at
      http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
     If you wish to leave this list please send the command
       leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
 Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
              [log in to unmask]
  Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
        To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
         SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
   (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed. If you have received this email in error 
please notify the originator of the message. 

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority,
states them to be the views of Telford & Wrekin Council.

The content of this email has been automatically checked in 
conjunction with the relevant policies of Telford & Wrekin Council.