Point well taken Miriam.
I just put the remark in for fun, I was
thinking of Heidegger in fact, who said he paid his respects to Roman Catholicism
by not discussing it…..ie we don’t have to fight everything we don’t
agree with.
Just for interest here is the full
Nietzsche quote:
“I do not want to wage war against
what is ugly. I do not want to accuse. I do not even want to accuse those who
accuse. Looking away shall be my only negation. And all in all and on the
whole, some day I wish to be only a YES sayer.”
274 Gay Science
From:
Sent: 12 December 2008 15:19
To:
[log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [COMMUNITYPSYCHUK]
red rags, bulls and hobby horses and all it takes to do nothing
Hi Grant,
I see that you were not shocked by Keiths quote, but I was shocked by the one
you are using to sign off.
"Looking away shall be my only form of negation"
Looking away is all it takes to negate. After that its very difficult to undo
that act.
Miriam
> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:04:39 +0000
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [COMMUNITYPSYCHUK] Post Modernism doesn't believe in progress-
red rags, bulls and hobby horses
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Hiya Keith,
>
> I enjoyed the quote you sent us! But I was not shocked.....
>
> A key question to the author might be "Who arbitrates on what
actually counts as 'progress'?" I am also quite worried about how we can
be sure history is marching 'forward'? History is more likely lost in a gloomy
forest.
>
> 'Post-modernism' is not 'unpopular', that is so not fair of Mclure! It
isn't competing in a philosophical 'X' Factor! Is Marxism the 'Take That' of
philosophy to 'Post-modernism's' Chas and Dave? :-)
>
> I think PM is a very loose ragbag of ideas that is still unfolding.
'Post-modern' thinkers often don't agree with one another and there are many
post-modernisms.... it can't be easy to be against it all but I know people try
;-)
>
> Mostly I just want to say I agree with David's posting and am in general
agreement with much of the quotation. The list of qualities of post-modernism
given, "fragmentation, ambiguity, loss of certainty" etc, reads like
a list of my personal values.
>
> It seems to me that people neglect the radical action element of a lot of
post-modern thinking. Foucault and Deleuze were very politically active on a
range of fronts and I would definitely recommend investigating the political
expression of the ideas in order to see how the philosophical thinking is
'useful' and 'pragmatic'. Foucault is very sharp when writing about living a
'non-fascist life', his strong emphasis on 'de-individualizing' seems
especially relevant to community psychologists, as does his injunction:
>
> "Do not think one has to be sad in order to be militant, even though
the thing one is fighting is abominable."
>
> Post-modern writer's emphasis on difference over uniformity, and mobile
arrangements over systems, provides rich resources for thinking about
communities in non-hierarchical non-authoritarian ways.
>
> There is something rather desperate and paranoid about some of the
Trotskyist attacks on PM thinking, and Alex Callinicos' "Against
Postmodernism" struck me as a deeply reactionary rant - but is a good read
if you want to size up some of the anti-pm arguments). I don't think the
Marxists and the Post-Modernists need to go to war with one another, but don't
want to go as far as Fred Newman who writes (in Against and For CBT p 220) (I
am)..."an orthodox Marxist - turned - post-modern Marxist"? Anyone on
the barricades with the Post-Modern Marxist Party?
>
> There is an interesting paper in History of the Human Sciences Vol 8 No 2
1995 by Edwards, Ashmore and Potter called 'Death and Furniture: the rhetoric,
politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism' which is an
entertaining read, even if it doesn't convince you it might make you smile.
>
> Yours, an indecisive relativist, Grant
>
> ("Looking away shall be my only form of negation" FN)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> Sent: 12 December 2008 08:07
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [COMMUNITYPSYCHUK] Post Modernism doesn't believe in progress
>
> Hi Keith,
>
> If by 'critique' you mean 'comprehensive criticism', I would not be
interested in offering that because (although there are issues in the quote
which I would problematise and although I appreciate that within dominant
frames of reference some of the points in the quote may be hard to accept and
easy to ridicule), I am in general agreement with much of (how I read) the
quotation and think community (and other) psychologies informed by such ideas
less problematic than the currently 'modernist' dominant ones.
>
> If by 'critique' you mean 'processing from a critical frame of reference'
(processing which would bring to the surface ideological implications including
ones which are progressive), I would be in interested in participating part in
that except that it would take some time to do adequately and I am struggling
to find time for existing commitments at the moment. However the book which you
talked about buying (Denzin and
>
> David
>
> ________________________________________
> From:
> Sent: 11 December 2008 19:32
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [COMMUNITYPSYCHUK] Post Modernism doesn't believe in progress
>
> Colleagues,
>
> I was shocked to read this from MacLure (1995) on the Impact of
> Postmodernism :
>
> As a starting point: think fragmentation, ambiguity, loss of certainty.
> Think of postmodernism as a kind of undoing of all the habits of mind of
> so-called western thought that have prevailed over the last two
> centuries - the decidability of truth, the inevitability of progress,
> the triumph of reason, the possibility of a universal modern code, the
> objectivity of science, the forward march of history, the existence of
> the singular, autonomous self. These foundational principles, are all to
> do with making the world knowable, accountable, unambiguous,
> generalisable, predictable, coherent, manageable and mutually
> comprehensible. They have all, at one time or another, been held to be
> characteristic of modernism. And post-modernism says 'No' to them. You
> will begin to understand its widespread unpopularity.
>
> MacLure, M. (1995) Postmodernism: a post script, Educational Action
> Research, 6 (3) 453-469
>
> Is there anyone out there who might offer me a critique of this
> postmodernism?
>
> Keith Venables
>
>
>
******************************************************************************
> Think before you print! Save energy and paper.
> Do you really need to print this email?
> Derbyshire County Council is one of the best councils in the country. With
the audit commission's top 'Four Star' rating we work to improve the lives of
local people by delivering high quality services.
>
> You can find out more about us by visiting 'www.derbyshire.gov.uk'. If you
want to work for us go to our job pages on 'www.derbyshire.gov.uk/jobs'. You
can register for e-mail alerts, download job packs and apply on-line.
>
> ******************************************************************************
> Please Note:
>
> This email is confidential, may be legally privileged and may contain
personal views that are not the views of Derbyshire County Council. It is
intended solely for the addressee. If this email was sent to you in error
please notify us by replying to the email. Once you have done this please
delete the email and do not disclose, copy, distribute, or rely on it.
>
> Under the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Freedom of Information Act 2000
the contents of this email may be disclosed.
>
> Derbyshire County Council reserves the right to monitor both sent and
received emails.
>
>
******************************************************************************
> ___________________________________
> COMMUNITYPSYCHUK - The discussion list for community psychology in the
> To unsubscribe or to change your details visit the website:
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=COMMUNITYPSYCHUK
> For any problems or queries, contact the list moderators: Rebekah Pratt
([log in to unmask]) or Grant Jeffrey ([log in to unmask])
> --
> Academic Excellence at the Heart of
> The
> number SC 011159.
>
> ___________________________________
> COMMUNITYPSYCHUK - The discussion list for community psychology in the
> To unsubscribe or to change your details visit the website:
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=COMMUNITYPSYCHUK
> For any problems or queries, contact the list moderators: Rebekah Pratt
([log in to unmask]) or Grant Jeffrey ([log in to unmask])
>
>
>
> (*
> (**HESA 2008)
>
> This message is intended for the addressee(s) only and should not be read,
copied or disclosed to anyone else outwith the University without the
permission of the sender.
> It is your responsibility to ensure that this message and any attachments
are scanned for viruses or other defects.
>
>
> ___________________________________
> COMMUNITYPSYCHUK - The discussion list for community psychology in the
> To unsubscribe or to change your details visit the website:
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=COMMUNITYPSYCHUK
> For any problems or queries, contact the list moderators: Rebekah Pratt
([log in to unmask]) or Grant Jeffrey ([log in to unmask])
Read amazing stories to your kids on Messenger. Try it
Now!
Napier University is the best modern university in Scotland* and number one in Scotland for graduate employability**
(*Guardian University Guide 2009)
(**HESA 2008)
This message is intended for the addressee(s) only and should not be read,
copied or disclosed to anyone else out-with the University without the
permission of the sender.
It is your responsibility to ensure that this message and any attachments are
scanned for viruses or other defects. Napier University does not accept
liability for any loss or damage which may result from this email or any
attachment, or for errors or omissions arising after it was sent. Email is not a
secure medium. Email entering the University's system is subject to routine
monitoring and filtering by the University.
Napier University is a registered Scottish charity. Registration number SC018373