Print

Print


Friends,

This is an interesting thread. Einstein did use up quite a bit of paper
to develop special relativity. It was mostly pencil or pen on paper, and
not too much chalk. But there is much more to it than that.

The equations of special relativity are implicit in much earlier work,
and Einstein built on much that came before, from Maxwell's equations to
Lorentz's work.

Several others might well have got there had they looked from a slightly
different angle.

What I like about the comparison of design research to Einstein's work
is that we have a good record of exactly the steps and missteps he made
at different times in his career. This kind of comparison comes round
often. Those who want to know more about one of the great thinkers of
history can learn for themselves how he thought his way through these
problems.

I've often thought that a great seminar in design research might begin
with a month of close readings and dialog on Einstein's work. One of the
things that becomes clear here is that Einstein's breakthroughs involved
both a willingness to think creatively AND willingness to apply
intellectual rigor to the problems he chose and the solutions he
attempted.

A bibliography of the imagined seminar reading list appears below.

Best regards,

Ken Friedman

--

Designers Think Through Einstein: Selected Readings

(1)

Einstein tells his own story in an autobiographical note:

Einstein, Albert. 1969 [1949]. “Autobiographical Notes.” In Albert
Einstein. Philosopher-Scientist. Third Edition. Edited by Paul Arthur
Schilpp. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Press, 1-94.

(2)

Einstein's five breakthrough papers of 1905 appear in a terrific
anthology with a useful introduction and comments by:

Stachel, John. 1998. Einstein’s Miraculous Year. Five Papers that
Changed the Face of Physics. Edited and introduced by John Stachel.
Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

(3)

Physicist and historian Abraham Pais wrote what many believe to be the
definitive Einstein biography:

Pais, Abraham. 1982. Subtle is the Lord. The Science and the Life of
Albert Einstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jeremy Bernstein's two books explain much about what Einstein meant, and
how ideas have been used, misused and abused:

(4)

Bernstein, Jeremy. 1993. "How Can We be sure that Albert Einstein was
Not a Crank?" Cranks, Quarks and the Cosmos. New York: Basic Books, pp.
15-27.

(5)

Bernstein, Jeremy. 1996. Albert Einstein and the Frontiers of Physics.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.

(6)

Finally, an excellent new book looks at what Einstein got wrong,
positioning his great contributions in the larger framework of his
mistakes and in the framework established by other great phycisists of
the 19th and 20th centuries:

Ohanian, Hans C. 2008. Einstein’s Mistakes. The Human Failings of
Genius. New York: W. W. Norton.


-----
Swinburne University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code: 00111D

NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended only for
the use of the addressee. They may contain information that is
privileged or protected by copyright. If you are not the intended
recipient, any dissemination, distribution, printing, copying or use is
strictly prohibited. The University does not warrant that this e-mail
and any attachments are secure and there is also a risk that it may be
corrupted in transmission. It is your responsibility to check any
attachments for viruses or defects before opening them. If you have
received this transmission in error, please contact us on +61 3 9214
8000 and delete it immediately from your system. We do not accept
liability in connection with computer virus, data corruption, delay,
interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised amendment.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.