 |
 |
Maxlorraine, >> "I don't think it's possible to 'state your reasons for disagreement' without entering into the argument. Such an intervention throws your stone into the pond that is the argument whether you like it or not." You're right. As I wrote those words, I wondered about that matter. I should have said that it is pointless to "continue" to argue with someone whom you discover to be impervious to reason. June