 |
 |
The *JISC/SIRIS "Report of the Subject and Institutional Repositories Interactions Study"*<http://ie-repository.jisc.ac.uk/259/1/siris-report-nov-2008.pdf>(November 2008) "*was commissioned by JISC to produce a set of practical recommendations for steps that can be taken to improve the interactions between institutional and subject repositories in the UK*" but it fails to make clear the single most important reason why Institutional Repositories' "*desired 'critical mass' of content is far from having been achieved*." The following has been repeatedly demonstrated (1) in cross-national, cross-disciplinary surveys (by Alma Swan<http://www.keyperspectives.co.uk/openaccessarchive/index.html>, uncited in the report) on what authors *state* that they will and won't do and (2) in outcome studies (by Arthur Sale<http://eprints.utas.edu.au/view/authors/Sale,_AHJ.html>, likewise uncited in the report) on what authors *actually do*, confirming the survey findings: *Most authors will not deposit until and unless their universities and/or their funders make deposit mandatory<http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/>. But if and when deposit is made mandatory, over 80% will deposit, and deposit willingly. (A further 15% will deposit reluctantly, and 5% will not comply with the mandate at all.) In contrast, the spontaneous (unmandated) deposit rate is and remains at about 15%, for years now (and adding incentives and assistance but no mandate only raises this deposit rate to about 30%).* The JISC/SIRIS report merely states: "*Whether deposit of content is mandatory is a decision that will be made by each institution*," but it does not even list the necessity of mandating deposit as one of its recommendations, even though it is the crucial determinant of whether or not the institutional repository ever manages to attract its target content. Nor does the JISC/SIRIS report indicate how institutional and funder mandates reinforce one another<http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/369-guid.html>, nor how to make both mandates and locus of deposit systematically convergent and complementary (deposit institutionally, harvest centrally<http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/136-guid.html>) rather than divergent and competitive -- though surely that is the essence of "*Subject and Institutional Repositories Interactions*." There are now 58 deposit mandates already adopted worldwide (28 from universties/faculties, including Southampton<http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/fullinfo.php?inst=University%20of%20Southampton%20School%20of%20Electronics%20and%20Computer%20Science> , Glasgow<http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/fullinfo.php?inst=University%20of%20Glasgow> , Liège<http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/fullinfo.php?inst=Universit%C3%A9%20de%20Li%C3%A8ge> , Harvard<http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/fullinfo.php?inst=Harvard%20University%20Faculty%20of%20Arts%20and%20Sciences> and Stanford<http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/fullinfo.php?inst=Stanford%20University%20School%20of%20Education>, and 30 from funders, including 6/7 Research Councils UK<http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/outputs/access/default.htm> , European Research Council<http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/fullinfo.php?inst=European%20Research%20Council%20%28ERC%29>and the US National Institutes of Health<http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/fullinfo.php?inst=National%20Institutes%20of%20Health%20%28NIH%29>) plus at least 11 known mandate proposals pending (including a unanimous recommendation from the European Universities Association<http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/fullinfo.php?inst=European%20University%20Association%20%28EUA%29> council, for its 791 member universities in 46 countries, plus a recommendation to the European Commission from the European Heads of Research Councils<http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/fullinfo.php?inst=European%20Research%20Advisory%20Board%20%28EURAB%29> ). It is clear now that mandated OA self-archiving is the way that the world will reach universal OA at long last. Who will lead and who will follow will depend on who grasps this, at long last, and takes the initiative. Otherwise, there's not much point in giving or taking advice on the interactions of empty repositories... Swan, A., Needham, P., Probets, S., Muir, A., Oppenheim, C., O'Brien, A., Hardy, R., Rowland, F. and Brown, S. (2005) Developing a model for e-prints and open access journal content in UK further and higher education<http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/11000/> . *Learned Publishing*, 18 (1). pp. 25-40. *Stevan Harnad <http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/>*