One hundred not out
– Parliamentarians mark a century of the state pension
If
current generations think concerns about pension provision is a modern headache
they need to look back in history, and perhaps find some guidance in the
process. This was the clear message from the autumn meeting of the All-Party
Parliamentary Group (APG) on Archives. On the auspicious date of 5 November,
the APG met at the Palace of Westminster to mark the centenary of the 1908
Pensions Act and the start of the 2008 Archives Awareness Campaign run, by the
National Council on Archives (NCA).
Next
to a display of the original Act and the public petitions both for and against
the landmark legislation, a panel of influential speakers debated how the Act,
which for the first time established a state pension for the United Kingdom, came
into existence. Frank Field MP used his first-hand experience as Tony
Blair’s first ever Minister for Welfare Reform to chair the debate as
eminent historian and Lloyd George biographer, Lord Morgan, Pat Thane
(Leverhulme Professor of Contemporary British History, the Institute of
Historical Research) and Alan Herbert (Chairman of the Pensions Archive Trust)
discussed the context, content and impact of the Act and its relevance for
modern policy making.
Debate
between the panel and that invited audience of archivists, historians,
politicians and pensions experts began by covering analysis of what the
original intentions were for state pensions were and how far the initial
characteristics of the system created by the 1908 Act have persisted to the modern
day. The 1908 Act established a non-contributory, low level and means-tested
benefit funded by central government. The Act’s purpose was to provide
assistance for the ‘deserving’ poor. Consequently, the first state
pensions did not provide enough for subsistence, requiring supplements from
other means. Means testing was also introduced further restrictions on who was
to be eligible for the payments. The Treasury was keen to keep costs down even
further and insisted on a starting age of 70 for the new benefit. The first
handouts issued in 1909 were given to only 500,000 people, two-thirds of whom
were women.
So
how much of the original Act’s principles remains today? In 1945 the
first majority Labour Government brought in a contributory element, but the
central government funding of the payments, a means testing element, the very
low value of the payments and the Treasury overview of the system persist.
Contemporary debate over the issue of pensionable age still looks set to
dominate the agenda for years to come. The ever-present feature of state
pensions then and now is that they do not provide the full support that people
need to survive into old age. As Alan Herbert pointed out and Frank Field
readily agreed, the role of occupational pensions has been fundamental to
supplementing state pensions for many, right from their inception.
One
of the surprising facts to emerge from a thorough investigation of the archives
is the dominance of women in the development of state pensions. Women were to
be the primary beneficiaries, picking up two thirds of the first pensions.
They lived longer than men, worked irregularly, were low paid and had little
chance to build savings; a combination of issues that many women still face
today.
A
formidable range of British Parliamentarians were involved in the creation of
the 1908 Act – Asquith, Lloyd George and Winston Churchill dominated the
Edwardian political landscape and provided the driving force for the reforming
zeal of the 1906 Liberal Government. However, it was noted that a state pension
had been on the political agenda since the 1870s, encouraged by innovations in
Germany and New Zealand. By the start of the Twentieth Century, concerns about
poverty and health dominated the public agenda and with the Liberal’s
1906 landslide election win, meant that in 1907 the Chancellor HH Asquith
started to put into practice for the first time in British politics, wealth
redistribution by higher taxes on the rich. Asquith had a shaky grasp of the details
of the Bill and several examples of slip-ups by him during the early stages of
it’s Parliamentary journey threatened to expose many of the potential
weaknesses in the Government’s position. However, upon the retirement of
Campbell-Bannerman as Prime Minister, Asquith moved into No 10 and Lloyd-George
(the Obama of his day according to Lord Morgan) took over as Chancellor to see
the Bill through its second reading and subsequent Parliamentary hurdles and
the rest is history. Another Liberal, William Beveridge, took a close interest
in the new legislation and the development of state pensions and was
particularly uncomfortable with means testing element for the inevitable
unfairness it bought for borderline cases and its ability to deter take-up. Means
testing remains a modern concern that has yet to be properly resolved, with
initiatives like tax credits and income support being the modern manifestation
of means tested benefits.
Another
striking similarity with today is how politicians looked to Europe for good
practice. The German scheme started by “Iron Chancellor” Otto Von
Bismark in the late nineteenth century was closely scrutinised. It was
actually an incapacity benefit for skilled workers in an attempt to deter out
of work labouring classes from the appeal of socialism. Whilst not completely
copied in the UK, British policy-makers still look today to European welfare
systems, including Germany, for inspiration across all areas of social policy.
The contribution to the debate by the Pensions Archive
Trust brought out the significance and historical development of occupational
pension schemes. Amongst the first occupational schemes included well-known
companies such as WH Smith and Retuers, developing pension provisions for their
employees in the 1860s. Driven by incentives such as taking advantage of
taxation rules, pushed by legislation and encouraged by the religious beliefs
of many of their founders, these early occupations schemes were and remain an
important supplement to the state pension. Alan Herbert also highlighted the
importance of occupation pension archives as a vital historical research
resource and the vulnerability that surrounds many such collections, including
archives held in electronic format, which are particularly susceptible to
digital obsolescence and ease of destruction.
Whilst,
at first glance, the marking of a centenary of a piece of legislation may be
considered a rather dull and dry undertaking and not one to spark lively and
controversial debate. However, the 1908 Old Age Pensions Act was the start of a
completely new role for government which was ultimately to result in the
Welfare State. It embodied the new political initiative of wealth
redistribution and a vision of social intervention that still endures. Those that
built the Act faced exactly the same problem as today’s politicians -
cost, payout value, age limits, parameters for means testing. The Act marked a
complete break with previous definitions of government responsibilities, an end
to laissez-faire and was a radical reaction to the very real concern of poverty
in Britain. If modern governments are to tackle today’s pension issues
they need to be as radical and learn from that Liberal government to finally
‘think the unthinkable’.
The
All Party Group on Archives was established to raise awareness of archival
issues amongst Parliamentarians. It is chaired by Tim Boswell MP and the
National Council on Archives provides the secretariat. For more information
contact René Kinzett, NCA’s Head of Public Affairs (020 8392 5376, [log in to unmask]).
Elizabeth
Oxborrow-Cowan
Consultant
Archivist
Tel/fax
01939 234289
www.elizabethoc.co.uk