OK... Ok... I'll admit it. Before I even clicked on the link I was all ready to lay into this whomever wrote this list because I was sure I'd be offended. Then beer started shooting out of my nose... On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Marcia Tanner <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > priceless, sarah! thanks so much. > > will distribute widely . . . > > marcia tanner > > > In a message dated 9/8/2008 10:05:41 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time: > [log in to unmask] (mailto:[log in to unmask]) > writes: > > the criteria to define interactive new media art: > > _ > http://www.nearfuturelaboratory.com/2008/09/05/top-15-criteria-define-interac > tive-or-new-media-art/_<http://www.nearfuturelaboratory.com/2008/09/05/top-15-criteria-define-interactive-or-new-media-art/_> > ( > http://www.nearfuturelaboratory.com/2008/09/05/top-15-criteria-define-interactive-or-new-media-art/ > ) > > > > > > > **************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, > plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. > (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014) >