>
> i'm afraid this quote merely replicates the problem in
> making three
> problematic assumptions:
For obvious reasons, I havenīt quoted the entire article, but I believe there indeed might be a strong indication of something thatīs tending towards not active / passive as the opposites, but active vs. interactive: like the lecturer, the live music which of course responds not only to the screened images but also the audience.
Besides, the exhibitioner also sometimes cut the screened footage himself, - my guess again - to please the audience something comparable with interactive games today.
*
*
Film-Philosophy salon
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
Or visit: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/film-philosophy.html
For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
*
Film-Philosophy online: http://www.film-philosophy.com
Contact: [log in to unmask]
**
