Print

Print



ATOM   6189  O   HOH W  63    14.409  51.932   0.124  1.00 46.53           O  
ATOM   6190  O   HOH W  64    26.387  33.040  -0.685  1.00 40.92           O  
ATOM   6191  CA   CA B   1      37.417  44.961  41.022  1.00 12.13         CA  
ATOM   6192  CA   CA B   2      23.027  43.324  21.110  1.00  5.01          CA  
ATOM   6193  CA   CA B   3      52.444  49.349   2.208  1.00 14.66          CA  
ATOM   6194  CA   CA B   4      34.610  74.683   4.564  1.00 10.52          CA  
ATOM   6195  CL    CL C   1      32.966  46.780   3.090  1.00  2.00           CL  
END

I also tried Ca, Ca2+ but no luck.  I added them to the structure with coot. Also, I forgot to say that the refinement works when I use another computer so it's something to do with mine.
Thanks,
Louise

----- Messaggio Originale -----
Da: Louise Gourlay <[log in to unmask]>
Data: Martedi', Agosto 19, 2008 4:26 pm
Oggetto: [ccp4bb] Refmac problems on Mac OS X Leopard
A: [log in to unmask]

> 
> Dear All,
> 
> I installed CCP4 on my Mac OS X Leopard system using fink. I 
> have some problems with Refmac, it doesn't refine calcium or 
> chlorine atoms, or any non-protein atom in general.  In the log 
> file it doesn't recognize them and says:
> FORMATTED      OLD     file opened on unit  45
> Logical name: ATOMSF, Filename: /sw/share/xtal/ccp4-
> 6.0.2/lib/data/atomsf.lib No match for atom ID CL subtracting 
> one character
>  No match for atom ID CA subtracting one character
> 
> Thanks,
> Louise
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Messaggio Originale -----
> Da: Garib Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>
> Data: Mercoledi', Luglio 30, 2008 2:28 pm
> Oggetto: Re: [ccp4bb] Preventing close contact between protein 
> and ligand
> A: [log in to unmask]
> 
> > Dear Snageetha
> > 
> > 1) Could you check please if specified atoms have zero 
> > occupancy.  
> > Atoms with zero occupancy are considered as absent and there 
> are 
> > not  
> > restraints on them
> > 2) symm y at the end of instructions means that the program 
> > check all  
> > possible symmetry operators and finds minimal distance. Most 
> > probably  
> > 5.024 is the distance between symmetry related atoms
> > 3) to remove antibumping between different chains there is 
> > an  
> > undocumented keyword. It can be used. the keyword is (as an example)
> > 
> > vdwrestraints exclude between chains A B
> > 
> > 
> > Please let me know if this instruction does not work.
> > NB: This option should not be used unless you know what you 
> are 
> > doing  
> > (that is the reason why it has not been documented). If there 
> > are  
> > clashes between chains then there are reasons for that. For example
> > if ligand has half occupancy then it is very likely that 
> > surrounding  
> > atoms also have multiple conformation and you should model them.
> > 
> > 
> > regards
> > Garib
> > 
> > 
> > On 29 Jul 2008, at 18:24, Sangeetha Vedula wrote:
> > 
> > > Dear bb users,
> > >
> > > I am refining a protein-ligand complex (at 1.68 A 
> resolution) 
> > in  
> > > which the ligand lies on a 2-fold crystallographic symmetry 
> > axis.  
> > > The ligand occupancy is, therefore, 0.5 in each asymmetric unit.
> > >
> > > I am almost at the end of the refinement but one problem has 
> > me  
> > > stumped. Refmac keeps moving a carbon in the ligand too 
> close 
> > to a  
> > > serine OG and an oxygen too close to an arginine CD. Given 
> > that the  
> > > ligand is at the interface, the density is not perfect. 
> > However, I  
> > > rebuild the ligand to eliminate close contacts and still be 
> > within  
> > > density and refmac pulls it right back close to the protein. 
> > The  
> > > refined position does not even look better than the rebuilt 
> > one! It  
> > > almost always looks worse! Would refmac put less weight on 
> > close  
> > > contacts with the ligand because it is only partially occupied?
> > >
> > > I tried to use external restraints between the ligand and 
> > the  
> > > residues so that they are kept further away.
> > >
> > > Upon searching the net, I found this command line:
> > >
> > > external distance first chain [ch] residue [res] insertion 
> > [ins] -
> > > atom [n] [altcode [a]] second chain [ch] residue [res] 
> > insertion  
> > > [ins]-
> > > atom [n] [altcode [a] ] value [v] sigma [s] [symm y/n]
> > >
> > > I thought (hoped) that the distance herein is the minimum 
> > distance  
> > > of approach between the specified atoms, I added these lines 
> > from  
> > > within "Developer options" in refmac interface:
> > >
> > > exte dist first chain A resi 59 atom CD seco chain X resi 
> 2001 
> > atom  
> > > O1 valu 3.2 sigm 0.02 symm Y
> > > exte dist first chain A resi 27 atom OG seco chain X resi 
> 2001 
> > atom  
> > > C10 valu 3.2 sigm 0.02 symm Y
> > >
> > > It didn't recognize these restraints at all.
> > >
> > > However, when I change these lines to:
> > >
> > > exte dist first chain A resi 59 atom CA seco chain X resi 
> 2001 
> > atom  
> > > O1 valu 3.2 sigm 0.02 symm Y
> > > exte dist first chain A resi 27 atom OG seco chain X resi 
> 2001 
> > atom  
> > > C10 valu 3.2 sigm 0.02 symm Y
> > >
> > > Refmac recognizes the first line but not the second - lines 
> > from  
> > > log file:
> > >
> > > Bond distance deviations from the ideal >10.000Sigma will be 
> > monitored>
> > > A     59 ARG CA  . - X   
> > 2001 DIE O1  . mod.= 5.024 id.= 3.200 dev=  
> > > -1.824 sig.= 0.020
> > >
> > > This raises two concerns:
> > >
> > > Concern 1: From the first line of output: the restraints 
> here 
> > don't  
> > > seem to be minimizing close contact at all; it seems to 
> think 
> > they  
> > > are bonded somehow (the distance between these atoms is not 
> > 5.024;  
> > > it is 6.26 A; I don't know what 5.024 A is!).
> > >
> > > I am missing something here. It'd be great if someone can 
> tell 
> > me  
> > > what that is!
> > >
> > > Concern 2: This command only works when the first atom 
> > specified is  
> > > a C-alpha atom (or maybe a main chain atom; I didn't try 
> > using  
> > > other main chain atoms). Why is that?
> > >
> > > AND ULTIMATELY,
> > >
> > > is there some way I can tell refmac not to make the ligand 
> > and  
> > > protein clash?
> > >
> > > I'd really appreciate any help!
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Sangeetha.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Louise Gourlay Ph.D Dep. of Biomolecular Sciences and 
> Biotechnology, Universitą degli Studi di Milano Via Celoria 26 
> Milano 20133 http://users.unimi.it/biolstru/Home.html Italy
> 
> 
> 

Louise Gourlay Ph.D Dep. of Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology, Universitą degli Studi di Milano Via Celoria 26 Milano 20133 http://users.unimi.it/biolstru/Home.html Italy