Print

Print


Hi everyone

 

I've consulted with our solicitors and I can confirm that copies of
scanned documents are used in housing benefit and fraud prosecutions.
In many cases, the original paper copy has been destroyed but to date
our solicitors have had no problems with the Magistrates' Court over the
admissibility of the scanned electronic copy.

 

In County Court original paper copies are still used.

 

Regards

 

Sarah

 

 

 

________________________________

From: The UK Records Management mailing list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Bridge
Sent: 01 July 2008 09:39
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Admission of scanned content

 


Dear All, 

As we have a solicitor who has all e-mails printed off for them [sic]
and they responds via Dictaphone I agree with Paul that it may be the
reticence of solicitors to accept new working practice. 

On the other hand we have a legal team who are leading and piloting a
scanning EDRMS case file project so they do not have to carry loads of
suitcases to and from court; which will accept the electronic records. 

I cannot remember who said it but it has been said that it is at the
Judge's discretion whether or not to accept an electronic records but
courts have been advised that they are acceptable. 

Regards 
David 








Paul Dodgson <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: The UK Records Management mailing list
<[log in to unmask]> 

25/06/2008 15:54 

Please respond to
Paul Dodgson <[log in to unmask]>

To

[log in to unmask] 

cc

 

Subject

Admission of scanned content

 

 

 





Hi all,


Many parts of our organisation are scanning closed case files (without
my guidance) and intend to rely upon that scanned content as evidence in
court.  If I advised them to stop, they would run out of storage space
in weeks. 

Another business area has, at last,  sought guidance.  I was delighted!
I went to BIP0008 and 0009 and then marched on through the workbook only
to be held by our lawyers at section 2.4 where legal issues are dealt
with and section 2.4.12 where legal consultation is required. 


We now have a situation where our lawyers are advising that to scan
content in presents too great a risk in terms of evidential weight.

Our lawyers are saying (not surprisingly) that the original must be
held.

However, much of what is regarded as an original these days actually
pre-exists the paper equivalent as an electronic record.  The excellent
BIP 0008 guidance and BIP 0009 workbook helps.  However, the argument
remains - if the courts want to see the "original" then that is (where
information is created electronically) the electronic representation (I
am careful not to call it the electronic copy - easy mistake to make).

Audit trails do not, generally, exist for paper records  often the
evidence as to admissibility comes from a stamp or a signature -
undoubtedly secure signs of admissibility!!(not). 

Electronic records at least hold some value in terms of evidential
weight which is a little more difficult to alter.  With EDRMS the
arguments as to evidential weight is somewhat stronger. 

Even if the paper copy was the original, Marc Fresko's comment about
best evidence should still stand. 

In conclusion, it is my view that it is the lawyers who are reticent to
move forward, the argument to the Judge about admissibility is merely
one which the lawyer wants to avoid. 

So why email?  I am trying to gauge the extent of problem this is posing
to records managers, in all business sectors, and where lawyers have
accepted the principle of scan and destroy - please do share this with
me. 

  

regards 

  

Paul Dodgson 



  
________________________________________________________________________
___ 
Support your local council workers in this year's National Council
Worker of the Year Awards by clicking: 
Vote for Jane Dabrowska -
http://www.localgovernmentchannel.com/awards/c/innovation/v/jane_dabrows
ka/y/2008/ 
Vote for Lee Fradsham -
http://www.localgovernmentchannel.com/awards/c/bravery/v/lee_fradsham/y/
2008/ 
  

________________________________________________________________________
___ 

Leicestershire County Council - rated a 'four-star' council by the Audit
Commission 

________________________________________________________________________
___ 

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, any reading, printing, storage,
disclosure, copying or any other action taken in respect of this e-mail
is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately by using the reply
function and then permanently delete what you have received. 

Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for
compliance with Leicestershire County Council's policy on the use of
electronic communications. The contents of e-mails may have to be
disclosed to a request under the Data Protection Act 1998 and the
Freedom of Information Act 2000. 

The views expressed by the author may not necessarily reflect the views
or policies of the Leicestershire County Council. 

Attachments to e-mail messages may contain viruses that may damage your
system. Whilst Leicestershire County Council has taken every reasonable
precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept any liability for any
damage which you sustain as a result of these factors. You are advised
to carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment. 

  

  

  

**********************************************************************

Opinions advice, conclusions and other information in this 

message that do not relate to the official business of 

Flintshire County Council shall be understood as neither 

given nor endorsed by it or on its behalf, and consequently 

Flintshire County Council shall bear no responsibility 

whatsoever in respect thereof.

Deellir na fydd unrhyw safbwyntiau, na chynghorion, na 

chasgliadau nac unrhyw wybodaeth arall yn y neges hon, 

nad ydynt yn berthnasol i waith swyddogol 

Cyngor Sir y Fflint, yn cael eu cynnig na'u cadarnhau ganddo 

nac ar ei ran, ac felly ni fydd Cyngor Sir y Fflint yn derbyn 

unrhyw gyfrifoldeb am y rhannau hynny o'r neges. 

**********************************************************************



**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
All incoming and outgoing e-mails are monitored for the presence of 
profanity and racist remarks, pornographic, sexually explicit or obscene material, and unsolicited content or spam.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
City of Newcastle website:-  http://www.newcastle.gov.uk
Newcastle Schools website:- http://www.newcastle-schools.org.uk
Visit NewcastleGateshead:- http://www.newcastlegateshead.com
Directgov:- http://www.directgov.gov.uk

**********************************************************************