Print

Print


Its hardly acceptable for official guidance to be just "replaced" by some 
research published by (no offense) an ad-hoc collection of interested parties 
with no statutory authority. If the CIEH/CLAIRE/SAGTA stats paper is to 
replace CLR07 Annex 1 we need to be told this is so by someone at the sharp 
end, otherwise it has questionable standing, especially when consultants get 
into "my best practice is better than yours" style arguements with each other