 |
 |
We are just putting together our SES and hope to be finished by end of this month. I have been working with an excellent consultant and if anyone wants further details please contact me at the details below. One of the main drivers to put together our SES is to try and streamline all the action plans and make them more meaningful for our institution. This has also had a positive effect when implementing our EQIA's and it lessens the paperwork!!! Angie Angie Cousins HR Manager, Equality & Diversity University of Surrey Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK Tel: +44 (0)1483 689189 [log in to unmask] http://portal.surrey.ac.uk/humanresources/structure/equal -----Original Message----- From: HE Administrators equal opportunities list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Caroline Old Sent: 01 July 2008 13:26 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: The Equality Bill - Impact on Higher Education CRM:0013425 We are implementing our SES prior to the deadline for the due date of the next DES. I will be following the ECU guidelines and recommendations regarding the bill. Anything that comes in that we haven't included I will add as a supplement. Caroline Old Equalities Officer Southampton Solent University East Park Terrace Southampton SO14 0YN Tel: 02380 319631 E-mail: [log in to unmask] Please note that my usual office hours are 08:15-17:15 Monday- Thursday. Deborah Viney <[log in to unmask]> Sent by: HE Administrators equal opportunities list <[log in to unmask]> 01/07/2008 13:06 Please respond to HE Administrators equal opportunities list <[log in to unmask]> To [log in to unmask] cc Subject Re: The Equality Bill - Impact on Higher Education CRM:0013425 The timeframe is that this will go into the Queen?s speech in November, which means Parliament will consider the bill in the next session and IF it is passed, it would be implemented some time after that. However if the govt. decides to call an early general election, then it might get lost altogether and never be considered during the life of this parliament. And of course if Labour lose the next General Election before the bill is passed, then the bill will die and never become law. My guess is that the earliest it could be implemented, even if everything goes to plan, is sometime in 2010. That means we would be due to produce our new Disability Equality Schemes, and possibly Gender Schemes too, before the new Act came in (if it comes in) regards, Deb Deb Viney Diversity Advisor, SOAS Email [log in to unmask] Tel 0207 898 4957 From: HE Administrators equal opportunities list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Fehmeeda Riaz Sent: 01 July 2008 11:17 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: The Equality Bill - Impact on Higher Education CRM:0013425 Dear All, I found this briefing from the Equality Challenge Unit very helpful indeed so many thanks to the ECU for producing such a concise and helpful document. I have a couple of questions that I hope colleagues will be able to help me with. Firstly, do we know when this new legislation is likely to come into effect. Currently, we have comprehensive and dedicated Race, Gender and Disability Equality Schemes which are underpinned by a Diversity and Dignity at Work & Study Policy which covers all strands of equality and diversity and lays out the procedures for dealing with bullying and harassment. We also have an Equal Pay Policy and cary out Equal Pay Audits every two years. We have done alot of work on religion and belief and promoting good relations between people of different faiths and backgrounds and have a very comprehensive religion and belief policy. I feel fairly confident that we are well equipped to meet the challenges of the new Equality Bill does it mean that most institutions will have to work towards a single Equality Scheme? Also, there has been alot of negative press about the Postive Action aspects and how this would apply in practice. Any thoughts would be most welcome! Best wishes Fehmeeda Fehmeeda Riaz University of Westminster HR Manager - Equality & Diversity HR Department, 5th Floor, Copland Building 115 New Cavendish Street London, W1W 6UW Tel: 020-7911-5776 From: Equality Challenge Unit [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: 30 June 2008 16:42 To: Fehmeeda Riaz Subject: The Equality Bill - Impact on Higher Education CRM:0013425 Equality Challenge Unit Briefing The Equality Bill ? Impact on Higher Education On the 26 June 2008 Harriet Harman, Minister for Women and Equality, made a statement in the House of Commons setting out the main themes of the Equality Bill which will be announced in the Queen?s speech in November and is due for publication in Spring 2009. While the Commons statement may not have contained much fine detail, it did make certain priorities clear. An Equality Duty The document confirms that a new ?Equality Duty? on public bodies will replace the current race, disability and gender duties. The new streamlined duty will cover not only those three areas, but also gender reassignment, age, sexual orientation and religion and belief. The Government will be discussing with relevant organisations how the new duty will work in practice, especially in relation to religion and belief. What this is likely to mean for higher education institutions is that they will need to take proactive steps to eliminate any unlawful discrimination against both staff and students on the new grounds, and probably also take steps to promote good relations for those groups and also between the groups. This would not require institutions to arbitrate between the different interests of ? for example ? certain fundamentalist religious groups and gay and lesbian staff and students. But it might provide a clearer and more transparent framework in which consensus could be sought. In many respects, the higher education sector is well-positioned for the new duty. It is already unlawful for institutions to discriminate against not just staff but also students, so the impact on the sector may be less than for other sectors where the law has only to date extended to staff issues. Further, many institutions are already actively engaged in ensuring that their institutions attract and engage with students of all ages and that students from different religious backgrounds are supported. A duty to promote good relations between the groups is already something that is integral to many institutions? approaches to promoting good campus relations. But where the duty is likely to have impact is in terms of requiring a more systematic and evidence based approach to all the equality areas. Engaging with issues such as the impact of religion or sexual orientation on campus will no longer be optional or just a question of ?good practice?, but will require a more strategic and systematic approach. Working with a range of higher education institutions, Equality Challenge Unit has already anticipated the extension of the public sector duties to all the equality areas: * The UUK/GuildHE/ECU publication Promoting Good Campus Relations, 2007 sets out advice and guidance, with many case studies from existing practice within institutions, of the promotion of good relations across all equality areas. This publication was extended in 2008 to focus specifically on issues of religion and belief; * The Unit has recently commissioned the University of Leeds to carry out research into what the barriers are, if any, faced by gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender staff and students in higher education which will assist institutions in determining what the priorities might be in terms of complying with the duty in relation to issues of sexual orientation (anticipated publication date January 2009); * Trans Staff and Students in Higher Education published in 2008 describes the steps that institutions might choose to take to support members of staff or students who have decided to change their gender, again illustrated with extensive case studies of inclusive practice from the sector. * General Guidance Note on Age and Student Issues, 2006, contains advice and case studies of a range of good practice in relation to age issues on campus. Positive Action The Bill will look to extend the scope of ?Positive Action? to allow institutions to take under-representation into account when selecting between two equally qualified candidates in the area of staff recruitment. This provision will be optional, not mandatory. It is likely to prove one of the most controversial elements of the new Bill. This power is already in use elsewhere in Europe, and for example in Scandinavian universities it is now common to see advertisements which state that ?priority will be given to a person of an underrepresented sex (in this case women), when applicants are otherwise equal.? The difficulty is that in practice it is unusual for applicant to be ?equal? and it remains to be seen how and in what ways higher education institutions might choose to use the new powers. It is disappointing that the Statement does not suggest that the positive action provision should extend to students. This is an area where institutions have expressed a need to have more freedom in treating different groups of students differently to enable them to compensate for past disadvantage, for example by offering student bursaries to underrepresented Black and Minority Ethnic applicants. Equality Challenge Unit has previously raised this issue with Government in their response to the Government?s original consultation (available on the ECU website), and will continue to make this point prior to the Bill being published. Pay Audits A great deal of joint work relating to equal pay has already been conducted, with employers and unions working together across the sector to achieve equal pay practices. Pay already forms an integral part of the Framework Agreement process, and for many institutions data on the pay gap is already in the public domain. Institutions will be expected to conduct equal pay job evaluation audits and publish the percentage difference in the average pay of men and women. It remains to be seen whether the percentage difference that is required to be published will include all pay, including market supplements, ex gratia payment and bonuses, and merit pay. Procurement The Bill will also be placing a duty on some private companies in relation to procurement, and will look to private companies working with institutions to produce audits showing the extent of their gender pay gap, as well as the proportions of their staff that come from ethnic minorities or who are disabled. This information may then impact on the institutions? engagement with the private provider, and feed into their approach to the new equality duty. Next steps A more comprehensive paper on the content of the Bill, and the Government?s response to the consultation, Discrimination Law Review; A Framework for Fairness: Proposals for a Single Equality Bill for Great Britain? will be published by the Government Equality Office shortly. This will offer more clarity on details for implementation of the Bill and the time allowed for institutions to review their practices. Equality Challenge Unit will continue to work with higher education institutions to clarify the implications of the Bill for the sector and will be feeding into government consultations on developing the specific duties underpinning the Bill. The Unit has launched an Equality Bill homepage containing information on developments of the Bill and their relevance to the Higher Education Sector. About the Equality Challenge Unit Equality Challenge Unit supports the higher education sector in its mission to realise the potential of all staff and students whatever their race, gender, disability, sexual orientation, religion and belief, or age, to the benefit of those individuals, higher educations institutions and society For further information and advice on equality and diversity in higher education T: +44 (0) 20 7438 1010 E: [log in to unmask] www.ecu.ac.uk The University of Westminster is a charity and a company limited by guarantee. Registration number: 977818 England. Registered Office: 309 Regent Street, London W1B 2UW.