Print

Print


  Just in case anyone is actually counting - I agree
  with Mark too!

Helen Farquharson
E-Resources Librarian
Cadbury Medical Library
Royal Orthopaedic Hospital
Bristol Road South
Birmingham
B31 2AP

0121-685-4029


  ---- Original message ----

    Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:29:07 +0100
    From: Mark Kerr <[log in to unmask]>
    Subject: Re: Splitting the list to separate out
    ILL requests? **Delete if time too valuable to
    read...**
    To: [log in to unmask]
    >Perhaps if someone with too much time on their
    hands could compare the number of people who have
    submitted or responded to a request (i.e. the
    colleagues who have sought and received generous
    assistance from other colleagues) against the
    number of those who are too busy to hit the delete
    button occasionally or do a proper set of
    filtering rules (but not to email the list about
    it), we'd have some evidence one way or another...
    (we should ignore the silent majority in both
    cases as they are clearly too sensible to get
    involved either way) and why aren't they
    complaining about the jobs and journal duplicates?
    What is it about ILLs that generate such passion?
    And do you also demand that Waterstones only
    stocks items in which they are personally
    interested? EBM = Evidence Based Moaning perhaps?
    >
    >Sorry, Friday mania seems to have caught me...
    >
    >ps. I vote for not splitting the list. Again.
    Sigh.
    >
    >Mark
    >
    >
    >
    >--------------------------------------------------------
    >Mark Kerr (x76020)
    >Clinical Librarian, EKHT
    >Kent and Canterbury Hospital
    >East Kent Hospitals NHS Trust
    >Ethelbert Road, Canterbury
    >Kent, CT1 3NG
    >
    >01227 864354 (Library)
    >01227 864156 (Direct Line)
    >01227 864154 (FAX)
    >----------------------------------------------------
    >
    >>>> "Hodgson, Julian"
    <[log in to unmask]>
    06/06/2008 11:01 >>>
    >
    >The number of responses don't seem to warrant any
    change so far.
    >
    >Julian Hodgson
    >Librarian
    >Wishaw General Hospital
    >Alistair Mackenzie Library
    >Ronald Miller Education Centre
    >Netherton Street
    >Wishaw
    >ML2 0DP
    >
    >01698 366316
    >[log in to unmask]
    >
    >SHELCAT is now live!
    >Shelcat is a new on-line catalogue that enables
    you to search the stock
    >of all the libraries in NHS Lanarkshire, and 41
    other participating
    >libraries. Library members can also renew loans
    and request items
    >on-line. Logon to www.shelcat.org/la to search
    our catalogue.
    >
    >
    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: UK medical/ health care library community /
    information workers
    >[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
    Toni Price
    >Sent: 06 June 2008 10:40
    >To: [log in to unmask]
    >Subject: Re: Splitting the list to separate out
    ILL requests? An
    >analysis of the replies
    >Importance: Low
    >
    >....perhaps we need a more scientific approach to
    this, if a decision is
    >going to be made on who actually posts a
    response....? Just a
    >thought....
    >
    >Toni Price
    >Information Specialist
    >NICE
    >ext 3089
    >Direct line 0161 8703089
    >
    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: UK medical/ health care library community /
    information workers
    >[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
    Susan LaceyBryant
    >Sent: 06 June 2008 10:38
    >To: [log in to unmask]
    >Subject: Re: Splitting the list to separate out
    ILL requests? An
    >analysis of the replies
    >
    >and another in favour = 13.
    >
    >happy friday.
    >
    >Sue Lacey Bryant
    >
    >Jason Harper writes:
    >
    >> Please can you make that 12 in favour of
    splitting the list? Since
    >this discussion took place, and the reminder to
    use the correct message
    >header went out, there have been quite a few ILL
    requests sent to the
    >list that have been incorrectly badged, and which
    my mail filter has not
    >been able to pick up...
    >>
    >> With thanks,
    >> Jason
    >>
    >> Jason Harper
    >> Assistant Librarian for the Sciences and Social
    Sciences
    >> Templeman Library
    >> University of Kent
    >> Canterbury
    >> Kent CT2 7NU
    >>
    >> E-mail: [log in to unmask]
    >> Telephone: 01227 827608
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: UK medical/ health care library community
    / information workers
    >[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
    Chris Fowler
    >> Sent: 05 June 2008 17:52
    >> To: [log in to unmask]
    >> Subject: Re: Splitting the list to separate out
    ILL requests? An
    >analysis of the replies
    >>
    >> Thank you for everyone who replied to me on
    this subject. Here are
    >the results:
    >>
    >> Don't Split - 17 in favour
    >> Split - 11 in favour
    >> Don't mind - 2 replies
    >> Union list suggestions - 2 replies
    >> Use existing ILL list - 1 reply
    >> Use 'Digest' mode - 1 reply
    >>
    >> Many people commented on the need to maintain a
    strict format in the
    >message header so that those folks who don't want
    to see ILL requests
    >can set up email filters to remove them. Diane
    Job's email of 4 Oct
    >2007 refers.
    >>
    >> For the few who asked about UHMLG, this is the
    University Health and
    >Medical Librarians Group whose pages are at
    http://www.uhmlg.ac.uk
    >>
    >>
    >> Chris Fowler
    >> University of Southampton library
    >> [log in to unmask]
    >>
    >
    >
    >__________________________
    >
    >Delivered via MessageLabs
    >__________________________
    >
    >_______________________
    >
    >Scanned by MessageLabs
    >_______________________
    >
    >NHS Lanarkshire Confidentiality and Disclaimer
    Notice
    >
    >***********************************************************************************************************************************************
    >
    >The information contained in this email may be
    subject to public
    >disclosure under the Freedom of Information
    (Scotland) Act 2002.
    >
    >This email is intended only for the addressee
    named above and the
    >contents should not be disclosed to any other
    person or copies
    >taken. Any views or opinions presented are solely
    those of the
    >sender and do not necessarily represent those of
    NHS Lanarkshire
    >(NHSL) unless otherwise specifically stated.
    >As Internet communications are not secure NHSL do
    not accept legal
    >responsibility for the contents of this message
    or responsibility
    >for any change made to this message after the
    original sender sent
    >it.
    >
    >We advise you to carry out your own virus check
    before opening any
    >attachment, as we cannot accept liability for any
    damage sustained
    >as a result of any software viruses.
    >
    >If you have received this email in error, please
    contact the IM&T
    >Helpdesk on 01698 258787 between 08:30 and 17:15
    Monday to Friday.
    >
    >http://www.nhslanarkshire.org.uk/
    >
    >***********************************************************************************************************************************************
    >
    >**********************************************************************
    >This email and any files transmitted with it are
    confidential and intended
    >solely for the use of the individual or entity to
    whom they are addressed.
    >Any views or opinions presented are solely those
    of the author and do
    >not necessarily represent those of East Kent
    Hospitals NHS Trust. If
    >you are not the intended recipient, be advised
    that you have received
    >this email in error and that any use,
    dissemination, forwarding, printing
    >or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.
    >
    >If you have received this email in error please
    notify the system
    >manager at the following email address:
    [log in to unmask]
    >
    >www.kentandmedway.nhs.uk
    >
    >This footnote also confirms that although this
    email message has been
    >swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer
    viruses, it is strongly
    >recommended that you carry out your own virus
    scan of this
    >message and any attachments.
    >
    >www.mimesweeper.com
    >**********************************************************************

**********************************************************************
This message  may  contain  confidential  and  privileged information.
If you are not  the intended  recipient please  accept our  apologies.
Please do not disclose, copy or distribute  information in this e-mail
or take any  action in reliance on its  contents: to do so is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. Please inform us that this message has
gone  astray  before  deleting it.  Thank  you for  your co-operation.

NHSmail is used daily by over 100,000 staff in the NHS. Over a million
messages  are sent every day by the system.  To find  out why more and
more NHS personnel are  switching to  this NHS  Connecting  for Health
system please visit www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail
**********************************************************************