Print

Print


Message
I'm a social scientist trying to make comparisons rather than judgments.
 
The contrast in the matter of choice of president seems so strong as to demand explanation.   The US presidency is hotly contested because of the powers of patronage of the President.   The winning party gets a vast array of jobs.
 
Does the lack of contest in Russia reflect limited powers of patronage on the part of the Russian President?
 
I think you are right to draw attention to the high standard of education in Russia particularly among women.   But this was established in the Soviet era.   Has it been maintained?  
 
I am reminded of the the high standard of education of Russian women every month when my wife's pay check arrives!
 
Ray Thomas, 35 Passmore, Tinkers Bridge, Milton Keynes MK6 3DY

 

-----Original Message-----
From: On all aspects of Russia and the FSU [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sasha Antonyuk
Sent: 07 May 2008 15:36
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: FT interview with Medvedev

What’s happening in Russia is undoubtedly not democratic, whatever you mean by democracy. I am against implying though, like you do, that democracy means “like in the western countries”. Russia has shown I the past that it’s a mature enough country to find its own path of development or even lead social development. For example, in Russia women got voting rights earlier than in most western countries. I think free higher education was introduced earlier as well.

 

It’s unrealistic to copy western culture, history, democratic institutions. Also, it has a racist (or imperialistic) flavour to it, “let’s educate those savages how to do democracy”.

Alexander

 

From: On all aspects of Russia and the FSU [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of R.Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 15:50
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: FT interview with Medvedev

 

To which might be added the question: Is it democratic for there to be debate about who should be leader?

 

Asking that question points to a sharp contrast between the open competition in the US and most Western countries.   Would it be fair to call the mode that that seems currently dominant in Russia an appointments system?

 

That description would also cover Chechnya.

 

Best wishes to all.

Ray Thomas, Faculty of Social Sciences, Open University

 

-----Original Message-----
From: On all aspects of Russia and the FSU [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alexander Antonyuk
Sent: 05 May 2008 21:23
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: FT interview with Medvedev

Dear Ray,

 

I am from Ukraine and am no fan of what’s happening in Russia and Ukraine. But as I pointed out before, trying to fit the situation into a simplistic “democracy – not a democracy” framework, drawing all the attention to the top political figures and ignoring the system as a whole, isn’t helpful.  

 

Could you at least vaguely define what you call democracy? Once you defined it would you answer yes or no to the following. Is it a democracy when almost all prime-ministers come from a certain class, as in Britain? Is it a democracy when you have competing political parties but they all represent various business groups’ interests, as in Ukraine? Can a society be at peace when democratic, or there should be a constant political battle with endless scandals and court cases to ensure it’s democratic?

 

Kind regards,

Alexander  

 


From: On all aspects of Russia and the FSU [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of R.Thomas
Sent: 05 May 2008 21:21
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: FT interview with Medvedev

 

Many members of ths list must be impressed by this interview as evidence of firm steps towards constitutional democracy.

 

Is the lack of comment on Medvedev's account indicate that members take such steps as for granted?

 

Ray Thomas, Faculty of Social Sciences, Open University

*************************************

 

-----Original Message-----
From: On all aspects of Russia and the FSU [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Oleg Golubchikov
Sent: 25 March 2008 09:00
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: FT interview with Medvedev

Interview transcript: Dmitry Medvedev

Published: March 24 2008 21:54 | Last updated: March 24 2008 21:54

Lionel Barber, editor of the Financial Times, Neil Buckley, Moscow bureau chief, and Catherine Belton, Moscow correspondent, interviewed Dmitry Medvedev, president-elect of the Russian Federation, in the Kremlin, Moscow, on March 21 2008. Below is an edited transcript

FINANCIAL TIMES: Mr President Elect, what will be your top three priorities when you take office?

DMITRY MEDVEDEV: I think these priorities are completely obvious. The main one is to continue the social and economic course which has emerged and evolved in our country in recent years. The goal of this course is to improve the quality of life for all Russian citizens.

We have managed to turn around the economic situation - we have become a much stronger state in this regard. Russia has joined the seven biggest economies in terms of purchasing power, but that’s not all. The main challenge now is to translate these economic successes into social programmes to show that developing the economy improves the lives of every Russian citizen. In recent times we have begun to implement some social programmes in the areas of education and healthcare and I believe that it’s very important to maintain and develop these programmes, getting on with the full-scale modernising of work in healthcare and education, as well as making it possible for the majority of Russian citizens to improve their housing conditions, which is also very important. And finally, Russia has pursued and will be pursuing a well-balanced foreign policy, aiming to defend its own interests in a non-confrontational way, so that Russia’s positions will contribute towards strengthening world security. Thus there are several priorities – to maintain economic stability, to develop economic freedoms, to promote social programmes and to ensure that Russia sustains its position in the world.

. . . . . .

 

*********************************************************************

 


? ????????? ?????????? ?????? SPAMfighter-? ??? ??????? ?????????????.
?? ?????? ?????? ????????? ??????? 422 ??????, ??????????????.
???????????? ??????? ?????? ?? ????? ????? ????????? ? ????? ??????????? ???????.
??????? ?? SPAMfighter ? ?????????? ????????? ?????????!

---------------------------------
The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).

 

Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.5/1399 - Release Date: 26/04/2008 14:17

 

Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.5/1399 - Release Date: 26/04/2008 14:17

 


? ????????? ?????????? ?????? SPAMfighter-? ??? ??????? ?????????????.
?? ?????? ?????? ????????? ??????? 424 ??????, ??????????????.
???????????? ??????? ?????? ?? ????? ????? ????????? ? ????? ??????????? ???????.
??????? ?? SPAMfighter ? ?????????? ????????? ?????????!

---------------------------------
The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).



? ????????? ?????????? ?????? SPAMfighter-? ??? ??????? ?????????????.
?? ?????? ?????? ????????? ??????? 430 ??????, ??????????????.
???????????? ??????? ?????? ?? ????? ????? ????????? ? ????? ??????????? ???????.
??????? ?? SPAMfighter ? ?????????? ????????? ?????????!

---------------------------------
The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).