It’s all over the BBC!:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7416524.stm
“In April, the latest chapter of … Pension
Trends said pensioner couples received on average £2,115 a year from private
pensions. In fact, the real figure for couples is more than four times larger,
at between £9,000 and £10,000 a year. “
The
reason is straightforward i.e. 52 weeks in the year, not 12. Hence the ratio 4+
to one.
But
should we not ban “on average” figures? The interesting thing is
dispersion and variation. (Not sure what a “private pension” is –
does it include all non-state pensions, or all non-occupational pensions?)
Although
we all want a big one, pensions seem designed to perpetuate inequality into old
age. (except that women recoup some of the gender inequalities by getting pensions
earlier and living longer). If these two factors worked against women rather than
against men, it would have been a big political issue a long time ago.
BTW one
thing I’ve found recently is that you can buy stakeholder pensions for
your kids. This has quite a lot of advantages – 25% tax enhancement; not
counted for Inheritance tax; they can’t spend it till 50; also it is not
counted on some means tests so if you invest enough of your income into
pensions your income becomes extremely low.
Happy
pension-hunting!
JOHN
BIBBY
All statements are on
behalf of aa42.com Limited, a company wholly owned by John Bibby and Shirley
Bibby. See www.aa42.com/mathemagic and www.mathemagic.org
From: email list for
Radical Statistics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jay Ginn
Sent: 29 May 2008 11:42
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: ONS error
I heard from an obscure pensions website
(ipe.com) that ONS made an error in the private pension receipts that were
published in Pension Trends. I downloaded the article and could have attached
it but thats not allowed on this list (?) and my email software doesnt allow me
to edit/copy/paste from internet to body of email.
The error in calculation occurred because weekly amounts
were treated as monthly amounts for some or all respondents to the survey.
Jay