Print

Print


Longshore union strikes against war
By PETER COLE
GUEST COLUMNIST

On Thursday, May Day, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union  
will declare an eight-hour strike to protest the war in Iraq. Since  
the ILWU controls every port along the U.S. Pacific Coast, including  
Seattle and Tacoma, this strike demonstrates the collective power of  
workers willing to use it.

The ILWU is demanding "an immediate end to the war and occupation in  
Iraq and Afghanistan and the withdrawal of U.S. troops from the Middle  
East." Although the majority of Americans repeatedly have expressed  
their desire to end the war, President Bush has not obliged us, so it  
drags on. Because our leaders refuse to listen, ILWU members are  
taking the next logical step for workers: Strike.

For those unfamiliar, the ILWU is perhaps the most militant and  
politicized worker organization in the nation. It operates in one of  
the most important sectors of the world economy -- marine transport --  
and, thus, is in a strategic location to put peace above profits.

Forged in the fires of 1930s worker struggles to gain basic rights,  
the ILWU was born in 1934 when longshoremen (there were no women in  
the industry then, though there are now) performed the incredibly  
hard, dangerous and important work of loading and unloading ships. To  
improve their wages and wrest some control over their lives, men all  
along the coast struck -- and in a few instances died -- to gain union  
recognition.

The ILWU is highly democratic. A caucus of more than 100 longshore  
workers representing every union local establishes policies for the  
Longshore Division. It was this caucus that voted to declare the May  
Day strike.

Dockworkers, including those in the ILWU, have a proud tradition of  
political action. For example, in the 1980s the ILWU respected the  
strike of British dockworkers by refusing to unload a ship worked by  
scab labor. Just last week, union longshoremen in South Africa refused  
to unload a Chinese vessel carrying military supplies destined for  
autocratic Zimbabwe -- a tremendous example of solidarity.

That the ILWU chose International Workers' Day to declare this strike  
suggests its political commitment and internationalism. Around the  
world, workers honor labor by taking a holiday. What few Americans  
know is that the tradition of a May Day strike originated not in the  
Soviet Union in the 1950s but the United States of the 1880s.

These days, such examples of worker power are increasingly rare in the  
U.S. The tragedy is that, historically, labor activism gave us the  
40-hour workweek (and the weekend) and helped humanize the  
exploitative excesses of unregulated capitalism. As income inequality  
continues to grow in the United States, it is wise to remember how, in  
the past, strong unions created a larger middle class as well as a  
more democratic and egalitarian nation.

The ILWU strike also reminds us that unions still have an important  
role in public discussions beyond the workplace. As a democratic  
institution, the ILWU is precisely the sort of "civic society" that  
the Bush administration has been trying to create in Iraq. On May 1,  
dockworkers will speak loud and clear -- end the endless war in Iraq.  
Other American workers who want to support our troops by bringing them  
home can make their voices heard by joining with the brave men and  
women of the ILWU and taking the day off.