Firstly, such denial of the possibility of determining between
"sight" and delusion, is unscientific and unprofessional.
Second, Manson's interpretation is not exactly clairvoyance.
It fits a scenario of someone reading meanings into something
from a respected (for him and his social set) source that
support what he wants anyway. Remember he was obsessed
with having a career as a rock singer.
Thirdly, since his plans failed to do what he expected them to do,
his input from outside his own crazed mind, if any, was not from
some source of invariable accuracy and reliability.
But that doesn't rule out another scenario. That the entity or
entities using him and feeding off the sex orgies and later the
bloodshed, may have had influence on The Beatles in writing
the song "Helter Skelter." By that time they had been fooling
with altered consciousness and so forth without any clear sense
of what they were looking for or what to avoid.
So it might be that Manson correctly interpreted a message,
but it was FROM the Beatles, it was unknowingly channeled
THROUGH the Beatles from something else.
Mary Christine Erikson
In a message dated 5/30/2008 12:11:44 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
>>and
how do you differentiate between actual inner sight and
delusion<<
Yes, who is to be the judge of what is "true" sight
and what is "delusion"?
The Manson Family (to bring them up yet again)
believed that The Beatles
were the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. Who is
to say that they
weren't?
