Print

Print


Dear David,



Here are some referencies that may help you :



D'ERRICO, F., GIACOBINI, G. (1985) - Approche methodologique de l'analyse de l'outillage osseaux, un exemple d'étude, L'Anthropologie, Tome 89, nº 4, pp. 457-472, Paris



GOUTAS, N. (2005) - Caractérisation et Evolution du Gravettien en France par l'approche techno-économique des industries en matières dures animales (étude de six gisements du Sud-Ouest), Dissertação de Doutoramento apresentada à Université de Paris I - Pantheon - Sorbonne, 2 volumes



KNECHT, H. D. (ed.) (1997) - Projectile Technology. Interdisciplinary contributions to Archaeology, Plenum Press, New York and London 




Premier Colloque International sur L'Industrie de l'os dans la PréHistoire, Abbaye de Senanque, Editions de l'Université de Provence, 1974



Méthodologie Appliquée a L'Industrie de L'Os préhistorique, Deuxième Colloque International sur l'Industrie de l'os dans la Préhistoire, Abbaye de Sénanque, editions du CNRS, 1977



WESCOTT, D. (ed.) (1999) - Primitive Technology. A book of Earth Skills, From the Society of Primitive Technology, Gibbs Smith, Publisher, Salt Lake City, USA





Good luck,



Marina Evora















  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: David Dyer 
  To: [log in to unmask] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 5:17 PM
  Subject: [ZOOARCH] Distinguishing antler from bone


  Dear Zooarch:

   

  Does anyone know of a good method, or can point out appropriate literature, to distinguish antler from bone in worked artifacts? I'm working with an archaeologist to identify materials used in artifacts from the 19th Century North American arctic. Some are obviously bone and obviously antler, but some are harder to distinguish. Any information would be helpful; ie. does compact bone in antler contain Haversian canals? Thanks!

  Sincerely,

     Dave

   

   

  David Dyer, Curator

  Zoological Museum

  University of Montana

  Missoula, MT 59812

  USA