On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Peter W. Draper wrote: > I've made a start on the "applications" tree, so will continue on that until > the end for the moment (it's a good test bed). Sadly experience is showing > that a simple accurate "list of bad docs" isn't going to happen, each one > will probably need at least a cursory check (although all documents using the > old-style %\begin{rawtex} magic in the preamble will need fixing). Get back > to all this after the holiday. Sorry to be dense but can't we use \include{} for the html definitions and the sst definitions? This whole transition would have been a lot easier if they were class/style files or even if they were just include from a TEXINPUTS directory set by star2html and by the build system. The prologue in each SUN consists of - define the document name and number - \include hypertext definitions - \include sst.tex - title page - document am I missing something? -- Tim Jenness JAC software http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/~timj