Dear all,

Picking up on John, Andrew and Martin's earlier points I think it's important that any consultant listing needs to explicitly list lead practitioners as well as organisational details.  This lead practitioner listing could include brief information on (i) the practitioner's qualifications and relevant skills and (ii) the number and nature of HIAs/IIAs/SEAs the practitioner has been involved in and in what capacity.  I envisage this would be more in the region of 200 words per practitioner rather than several pages.

I've recently observed some organisations professing to have in-house expertise in HIA that I know they don't possess.  Do list-members think listing lead practitioners might minimise the risk of this occurring with organisations listed on the Gateway?

Best wishes,

Ben
--

Ben Harris-Roxas
Research Fellow
www.hiaconnect.edu.au

Centre for Health Equity Training, Research and Evaluation (CHETRE)
Part of the UNSW Research Centre for Primary Health Care & Equity
University of New South Wales, Australia
CHETRE is a Unit of the Division of Population Health, Sydney South West Area Health Service

Contact Details
Phone +61 2 9612 0639 | Fax +61 2 9612 0762 | Email [log in to unmask] | Skype ben_harris-roxas

Postal Address
CHETRE
LMB 7103
Liverpool BC NSW 1871 Australia

CRICOS Code 00098G


Martin Birley wrote:
Message
Suggest adding field for linking practitioner's website. In longer term I'd like to see an accreditation process emerge, for shorter term
consider a field for listing the sectors in which practitioner has experience, or some other record of experience?
 
I'm not optimistic that invitations to tender will help. I don't think clients work that way.
 
 

Martin Birley
http://www.birleyhia.co.uk/
Mobile +44 (0) 7725040361
Landline +44 (0) 208 546 0823
Mail: 44 Woodbines Av, Kingston, Surrey, KT1 2AY, UK
Skype(mic/cam) martinbir
Conference call access number +44(0)7953 953 953

-----Original Message-----
From: Health Impact Assessment for the United Kingdom and Ireland [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Andrew Buroni
Sent: 03 March 2008 10:42
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: HIA gateway - consultants

Morning John

 

            I agree the HIA Gateway website would be most useful in facilitating client / practitioner relations, will aid in supporting new and emerging practitioners while also increasing opportunities for competitive tenders.

 

This is not only beneficial to clients in that it allows them to review the current skills base and target invitation to tenders accordingly, but will also help in further evolving HIA. I say this as new practitioners and more competitive tenders not only promote innovation but also drive more cost effective HIA. Both are vital to the further mainstreaming of HIA.

 

The two key sections I would suggest include:

  • HIA Practitioner Data base; and
  • HIA Invitation to Tender.

 

HIA Practitioner Data base

 

I don’t recommend it to be too detailed; at most it should include the following information:

 

  • Organisation;                             Jo blogs group
  • HIA Services                              brief description of service provision limited to a set number of characters
  • Regional capacity                      the geographic area the practitioner is willing to work
  • Key contact; and                       name of person likely to remain the key contact for this organisation for an extended period
  • Contact details.                        

 

This provides a balance of the minimum level of information a client need to identify potential service providers and the minimum maintenance effort.

 

The latter point is important, in that you don’t want to have to commit too many resources to maintain this.

 

I also recommend you consult someone on any legal / liability implications from posting such a database and give some though on an appropriate caveat that states that you do not vouch for the people / organisations presented in this data base.

 

HIA Invitation to Tender

 

The other approach is to provide a page to advertise HIA tenders. Although beneficial and complementary to the HIA practitioner data base, it should not be seen as an alternative. Displaying invitation to tenders will require more frequent update, will not support new and emerging practitioners, nor will it provide potential clients the opportunity to target appropriate practitioners.

 

John, I hope this is of use.

 

All my best

 

Andrew

 

 

Andrew Buroni
Senior Consultant
Health Impact Assessment
RPS
6-7 Lovers Walk
Brighton
BN1 6AH

 

T: 01273 546800
F: 01273 546801

 


From: Health Impact Assessment for the United Kingdom and Ireland [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of HIA gateway
Sent: 03 March 2008 09:12
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: HIA gateway - consultants

 

Dear All

 

There has been a fair amount of discussion about how the HIA gateway should handle HIA consultants (ie people or firms who offer to do HIAs or HIA related work in return for fees.) The HIA people directory is limited to people and offers little scope for those wishing to offer services to lay out what they offer. Similarly the links page only carries links to publicly funded organisations (not to commercial firms).

 

It has been suggested that we should add an additional directory for consultants. If we do this we obviously need to have clear rules as to the content of the entry and the nature of the claims that could be made. Once again any such page would have to carry a clear warning that the HIA gateway did not in any way endorse the claims made.

 

I would be most grateful to hear opinions as to

1. Should the HIA gateway include a consultants directory?

2. If so what information should the consultants be asked to supply, what guidance should they be given and what limitations should there be. 

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Cheers

 

John

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any reading, printing, storage, disclosure, copying or any other action taken in respect of this e-mail is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by using the reply function and then permanently delete what you have received.

The information contained in this e-mail may be subject to public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The confidentiality of this e-mail and your reply cannot be guaranteed,unless the information is legally exempt from disclosure.

 

This e-mail message and any attached file is the property of the sender and is sent in confidence to the addressee only. The contents are not to be disclosed to anyone other than the addressee. Unauthorised recipients are requested to preserve this confidentiality and to advise the sender immediately of any error in transmission. If you experience difficulty with opening any attachments to this message, or with sending a reply by email, please telephone on + 44-(0)1235 438151 or fax on + 44-(0)1235 438188.

Any advice contained in this e-mail or any accompanying file attached hereto is for information purposes only. RPS do not take any responsibility for differences between the original and the transmission copy or any amendments made thereafter. If the addressee requires RPS to be responsible for the contents of this e-mail, RPS will be pleased to issue a signed hard copy of the document upon request.

RPS Group Plc, company number: 208 7786 (England). Registered office: Centurion Court, 85 Milton Park Abingdon Oxfordshire OX14 4RY.

RPS Group Plc web link: http://www.rpsgroup.com